Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,835 Year: 4,092/9,624 Month: 963/974 Week: 290/286 Day: 11/40 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Do feelings count?
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 7 of 135 (292271)
03-05-2006 12:39 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by robinrohan
03-04-2006 5:23 PM


From a Christian point of view there is an objective morality, God's moral law, and also the factor of fallenness that means our moral sense is flawed, which explains why we can't all agree on moral principles.
While there is also an indication in Christian thought that beauty is objective, which is at least related to the question about aesthetics, I don't know much about this and don't know if anybody has ever made a case for it from the Christian point of view.
I feel a need for some definitions for this thread, from Moral Philosophy and the Philosophy of Aesthetics maybe.
{abe: In general, I think the Fall means that our feelings about these things can't be relied upon, which agrees with the fact that it's impossible to establish an objective standard for either morality or aesthetics.
This message has been edited by Faith, 03-05-2006 12:42 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by robinrohan, posted 03-04-2006 5:23 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by robinrohan, posted 03-05-2006 12:50 AM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 12 of 135 (292362)
03-05-2006 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by robinrohan
03-05-2006 12:50 AM


I agree there is no way to ground morality logically. The only way it can be objectively grounded is by an absolute authority such as God.
But continuing on my Christian presuppositions, I explain the observation that there is at least a rough moral consistency across the human race as the persistence of the image of God in humanity, however broken. But since in fact we are broken, there is no independent way of showing that this rough consistency amounts to an objective moral standard.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by robinrohan, posted 03-05-2006 12:50 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by robinrohan, posted 03-05-2006 11:58 AM Faith has not replied
 Message 45 by Chiroptera, posted 03-07-2006 4:41 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 13 of 135 (292364)
03-05-2006 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by robinrohan
03-05-2006 11:28 AM


Deliberate cruelty is one of the things that always made me feel a sort of vertigo, like the bottom of my stomach dropping out, like the universe is out of whack if such a thing can exist at all. That is what made my discovery of Original Sin so satisfying.
But unfortunately the mere existence of anyone who can commit deliberate cruelty makes your strong feeling against it impossible to prove as objective.
I had a girlfriend as a child who would pull wings and legs off insects with a strange glee. I'm no fan of insects but I'd rather kill them than torture them. She went on to become a laboratory scientist by the way.
This message has been edited by Faith, 03-05-2006 11:58 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by robinrohan, posted 03-05-2006 11:28 AM robinrohan has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 17 of 135 (292405)
03-05-2006 2:26 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Silent H
03-05-2006 2:17 PM


Can you think of someone you'd enjoy seeing tortured, or not care if they were?
I've hated some people that much, to THINK I'd enjoy seeing them tortured, but in reality if I were to witness it actually happening, I don't think I could stand it.
Those who can witness such a thing either with pleasure or just with indifference, are very hard to understand.
It is possible that I could tolerate quite well, possibly even enjoy, the torture of someone who had committed torture himself I suppose, but even then I think I'd prefer instantaneous capital punishment. I have nothing against a firing squad myself though. Or hanging. Not into the niceties of avoiding the psychological pain of anticipation.
ABE: Perhaps the example of feelings about cruelty suggests that the real topic here is justice, that all morality is about justice ultimately, and that justice is always flawed.
This message has been edited by Faith, 03-05-2006 02:39 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Silent H, posted 03-05-2006 2:17 PM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by nator, posted 03-06-2006 7:20 AM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 134 of 135 (298036)
03-25-2006 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 132 by Hangdawg13
03-24-2006 9:44 PM


Semantic problem. Not feelings in the sense of tactile sense, but feelings in the sense of emotions or apprehensions and that sort of thing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by Hangdawg13, posted 03-24-2006 9:44 PM Hangdawg13 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024