Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   But isn't vaccination consistent with Naturopathic philosophy?
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 1 of 49 (429669)
10-21-2007 8:00 AM


It is my understanding that one of the main tenets of Naturopathic philosophy is that the body has an innate ability to heal itself from any disease, and that treating the symptoms of disease is inferior to treating the root causes of the disease. Naturopathy seeks to support and encourage the body's healing mechanisms through natural means.
Isn't that exactly what vaccines do?
Vaccines are simply a controlled, tested way to encourage the body to produce antibodies to a specific virus by introducing a killed or weakened version of it to the bloodstream. Viruses have distinctive protein coats, and the body's immune system produces antibodies specific to any virus' protein coat it is exposed to.
This not only satisfies the tenet of treating the root cause, rather than the symptoms, of a disease (the root cause of people getting diptheria, for example, is lack of antibodies to the diptheria virus), it also is addressing the tenet of supporting and encouraging the body's own disease defense system.
Yes, actually coming down with a disease can often confer the same immunity, but it also means that a person actually has to suffer through the disease. Most of the diseases that we vaccinate for have a good chance of serious permenent damage to the body, including death which is far greater than the chance of damage from the vaccine. One also is able to infect others, where most vaccines do not make a person contaigous.
So, I am really not sure why Naturopathy would reject the idea of vaccines when they actually encourage the body's own natural defense mechanism, while at the same time accepting the idea of ingesting herbal drugs to treat the symptoms of disease.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by purpledawn, posted 10-21-2007 12:05 PM nator has replied
 Message 3 by Kitsune, posted 10-21-2007 1:10 PM nator has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3482 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 2 of 49 (429696)
10-21-2007 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by nator
10-21-2007 8:00 AM


Fillers and Ingredients
This is purely personal opinion.
As I understand it the problem isn't with the concept of a vaccine, but the additional fillers and ingredients and how they may impact developing bodies.
From what I can tell the issue isn't just that one ingredient or filler may cause a specific problem, but that as the number of mandatory vaccines increase and some given earlier; our children are exposed to more of these questionable ingredients and fillers and the impact on our children isn't as obvious as allergic reactions or death.
The long term effect on society would also be a consideration. Are the antibodies produced by vaccines effective as long term as those naturally developed? If not, then more vaccinations are needed. As these needs increase how many vaccinations can our bodies deal with? Are we creating a trend that may escalate beyond our capabilities?
How many vaccines does CDC recommend for children?
Currently, CDC recommends vaccination against 12 vaccine-preventable diseases. Because some of these vaccines have to be administered more than once, a child may receive up to 23 shots by the time he or she is 2 years of age. Depending on the timing, a child might receive up to six shots during one visit to the doctor.
Could we be weakening the human immune system with food additives and vaccine fillers/ingredients?
Hind sight is 20/20. Unfortunately we have to wait till we get to the future to look back.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 10-21-2007 8:00 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by molbiogirl, posted 10-21-2007 1:31 PM purpledawn has not replied
 Message 9 by nator, posted 10-21-2007 5:31 PM purpledawn has replied
 Message 21 by nator, posted 10-22-2007 7:58 AM purpledawn has replied

  
Kitsune
Member (Idle past 4325 days)
Posts: 788
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 09-16-2007


Message 3 of 49 (429713)
10-21-2007 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by nator
10-21-2007 8:00 AM


Actually, part of the philosophy of naturopathy is to only put into the body that which belongs there, examples of this being food, vitamins, and essential fatty acids. Vaccines contain a whole spectrum of substances that are foreign to the body (see PD's link in Message 2). Dr. Andrew Saul, assistant editor of the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, explains at his Doctor Yourself website:
Now if you or your kids live on candy, hamburgs, shakes and steaks, you'd best get inoculated. Just as overfed, undernourished laboratory rats get sick at any brush with disease, so do overfed undernourished people. The germ theory and the vaccination theory begin to apply as far as a body is chronically weakened by wrong diet, overwork, chemicals in foods, drugs in the body and other unnatural abuse. A weakened body, a polluted body is fertile ground for assorted microbes to multiply. To the extent that vaccines and drugs deal with microbes only, they are apparently effective.
That phrase was "apparently" effective. Like adding "Drano" to a polluted pond, the chemical intervention results in death of germs. Naturopaths feel that microbe death is at the expense of poisoning the body with the drugs or vaccines. Poison on top of poison fails to get at the root cause of all illness, which is "polluted body" or systemic toxemia. In fact, the added drugs and vaccines compound the body's problem, for they cause side effects and new troubles of their own. The person gets more vaccines and still more drugs, to try to cover all these new illnesses, and then even more illness results. The cycle can go on and on for a lifetime, never solving the real problem.
Body pollution from wrong diet and neglect of natural living principles is the cause of disease. How can inoculations be given for neglect? How can you vaccinate a body against abuse? How can you be immunized against bad diet and insufficient vitamins? It can't be done. The allopathic medical establishment is looking into test tubes for answers that are found at our dinner tables. Drug companies' chemicals and hospitals' equipment cannot eliminate disease because they do not bring health in its place. Only you, yourself, can live in such a way as to become and stay well. Then the underlying causes of illness, including those we're usually immunized against, are eliminated without vaccination.
This includes large doses of vitamin C. Dr. Fred Klenner, MD, was successfully treating polio cases in the 1950s with vitamin C injections. He was one of Linus Pauling's inspirations. Unfortunately, his work has been almost entirely ignored, perhaps due to the introduction of the polio vaccine. This site lists his work which was published in the Tri-State Medical Journal.
Here are the details as to how Dr. Klenner handled the 60 cases of polio when it was epidemic in Dr. Klenner's home state.
... "These patients presented all or almost all of these signs and symptoms: fever of 101 to 104.6 degrees F., headache, pain at the back of the eyes, conjunctivitis, scarlet throat; pain between the shoulders, the back of the neck, one or more extremity, the lumbar back; nausea, vomiting and constipation."
"The treatment employed was vitamin C in massive doses. The initial dose was 1000 to 2000 milligrams ( 1 to 2 grams ) depending on age. Children up to four years received the injections intramuscularly . . . the temperature curve was adopted as the guide for additional medication. Temperature response after the second hour was taken to indicate the second one or two gram injection. If there was a drop in fever after two hours, two more hours was allowed before the second dose. This schedule was followed for 24 hours. After this time the fever was consistently down, so the drug was given 1 to 2 grams every six hours for the next 48 hours. All patients were clinically well after 72 hours. After three patients had a relapse the drug was continued for at least 48 hours longer, one to two grams every eight to twelve hours."
"Where spinal taps were performed, it was the rule to find a reversion of the fluid to normal after the second day of treatment." ( Note: No paralysis developed in any of the 60 cases. )
The "root cause" of disease, as Dr. Saul mentioned, is susceptibility due to a number of factors. If a disease is contracted by a healthy person with adequate nutritional and vitamin intake, its course should be benign.
I don't know if you've heard of the work of Weston A. Price. He was a dentist who traveled the world in the early 20th century. He believed that the state of a person's dental health was a key indicator of their state of overall health, and he published a book in 1939 called Nutrition and Physical Degeneration. You can read about him on Wikipedia:
Some of the cultures studied include the inhabitants of the Ltschental in Switzerland, the inhabitants of the Isles of Lewis and Harris in the Outer Hebrides of Scotland, the Eskimos of Alaska and Canada, the Native Americans, among the inhabitants of New Caledonia, Fiji, Samoa, the Marquesas Islands, Tahiti, Rarotonga, Nukualofa, Hawaii, the Masai, Kikuyu, Wakamba and Jalou tribes of Kenya, the Muhima of Uganda, the Baitu and Watusi of Rwanda, the Pygmies, and Wanande in the Congo, the Terrakeka, Dinka and Neurs of Sudan, the Aborigines of Australia, the inhabitants of the Torres Strait, the Mori of New Zealand, the Tauhuanocans, Quechua, "Andes Indians", "Sierra Indians" and "Jungle Indians" of Peru.
In his studies he found that plagues of modern civilization (headaches, general muscle fatigue, dental caries (cavities), impacted molars, tooth crowding, allergies, heart disease, asthma, and degenerative diseases such as tuberculosis and cancer) were not present in those cultures sustained by indigenous diets. However, within a single generation these same cultures experienced all the above listed ailments with the inclusion of Western foods in their diet: refined sugars, refined flours, canned goods, etc.
In the villages of the Swiss Alps where he began his investigations, he found that the residents never brushed their teeth -- which were sometimes coated with a green slime. Yet only about 1% of the teeth had any decay. Severe childhood illnesses were virtually nonexistent and there had never been a single case of tuberculosis. You can read in more detail about his studies here.
You say that in order to gain natural immunity to a pathogen, a person has to "suffer through the disease." As I stated above, if the person is well nourished, there is no reason why there should have to be suffering. Indeed, it is well known for people to experience subclinical infections and develop immunity without ever having had outward symptoms.
You said:
Most of the diseases that we vaccinate for have a good chance of serious permenent damage to the body,
It depends on which one you are talking about. According to Wikipedia, only 1% of polio cases result in paralysis; and of those, most recover with no complications. It's a shame that no one took up Klenner's vitamin C work in this area.
The incidence of death from measles in developed countries is 1 in 1,000, according to Wikipedia.
Also, as I have argued, "childhood" diseases such as measles, mumps and rubella ought to be benign if a person's nutritional status (including vitamin C levels) is good. I stated in the previous vaccination thread that I don't see a problem with offering a rubella vaccine to women of childbearing age if they have not yet been exposed to the virus.
which is far greater than the chance of damage from the vaccine.
The jury is still out on what the possible damage could be. There have been documented adverse events for every vaccine, and people in the US and the UK have been awarded compensatory sums by their respective governments.
The National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued a report on child vaccinations in 2002, urging more research. Among their comments:
The report, issued by the IOM's Immunization Safety Review Committee, found that scientific evidence from epidemiological studies on whether allergy, including asthma, can be caused by multiple vaccinations was conflicting and concluded that the evidence "was inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship." The Committee concluded that epidemiological studies to date "favor rejection of a causal relationship between multiple immunizations and increased risk for infections and for type 1 diabetes." However, the Committee also concluded that they did find some biological mechanism evidence that vaccines could increase the risk of immune dysfunction in some children that could lead to increased infections and allergy, including asthma. They stated that "the biological mechanisms evidence regarding increased risk for infections is strong."
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has long advocated increased basic science research into the biological mechanisms for immunity and vaccine adverse events, with particular emphasis on identifying genetic and other biomarkers that may play a role in increasing susceptibility for vaccine-induced neuroimmune dysfunction. Acknowledging the absence of research into this area, the Committee said, "The Committee was unable to address the concern that repeated exposure of a susceptible child to multiple immunizations over the developmental period may also produce atypical or non-specific immune or nervous system injury that could lead to severe disability or death. (Fisher, 2001). There are no epidemiological studies that address this. Thus, the committee recognizes with some discomfort that this report addresses only part of the overall set of concerns of some of those most wary about the safety of childhood immunizations."
You also said:
most vaccines do not make a person contaigous.
There are documented cases of people coming down with vaccine-related infections. Polio is a well-known one. This report, documenting the spread of the virus from the vaccine in a polio-free highly vaccinated population, concludes that we need to keep vaccinating, more or less ad infinitum, in order to keep this evolving virus at bay. So much for vitamin C.
There was also an outbreak this year in Nigeria, linked directly to the live vaccine, which has left 69 children paralyzed.
It can happen with smallpox too. This case was linked directly to contact with a military smallpox vaccinee.
It's a pretty nice gravy train, isn't it, when we have to keep vaccinating against diseases caused by vaccination.
while at the same time accepting the idea of ingesting herbal drugs to treat the symptoms of disease
Sometimes it is necessary to treat the symptoms while the root cause is being addressed. At any rate, herbal medicine is OT here, going by the topic of this thread.
Edited by LindaLou, : No reason given.
Edited by LindaLou, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 10-21-2007 8:00 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by molbiogirl, posted 10-21-2007 1:27 PM Kitsune has replied
 Message 10 by nator, posted 10-21-2007 5:56 PM Kitsune has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2667 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 4 of 49 (429717)
10-21-2007 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Kitsune
10-21-2007 1:10 PM


Message 296
I stopped talking on the amalgam thread and if a new vaccine thread is started I will not go there. I'm tired and I want to talk about other things.
Not so much, huh?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Kitsune, posted 10-21-2007 1:10 PM Kitsune has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Kitsune, posted 10-21-2007 1:50 PM molbiogirl has not replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2667 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 5 of 49 (429718)
10-21-2007 1:31 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by purpledawn
10-21-2007 12:05 PM


Re: Fillers and Ingredients
As I understand it the problem isn't with the concept of a vaccine, but the additional fillers and ingredients and how they may impact developing bodies.
From what I can tell the issue isn't just that one ingredient or filler may cause a specific problem, but that as the number of mandatory vaccines increase and some given earlier; our children are exposed to more of these questionable ingredients and fillers and the impact on our children isn't as obvious as allergic reactions or death.
You need to support these statements, PD.
I showed quite clearly in the previous thread that the ingredients in vaccines are perfectly safe.
If you have evidence to the contrary, you need to post it.
Wild supposition (your string of "What if...?" questions) speaks of paranoia, not reasoned contemplation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by purpledawn, posted 10-21-2007 12:05 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
Kitsune
Member (Idle past 4325 days)
Posts: 788
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 09-16-2007


Message 6 of 49 (429720)
10-21-2007 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by molbiogirl
10-21-2007 1:27 PM


I'm thinking about what Percy said regarding slowing down and spending more time finding good sources. I personally have no problem with the Whale site, though I will make sure I look up references for its assertions and present those.
I'm warning now, though, that if another pile-on occurs, I will not be able to reply to every post. If I'm going to spend time writing quality responses then there will have to be less of them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by molbiogirl, posted 10-21-2007 1:27 PM molbiogirl has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by purpledawn, posted 10-21-2007 3:12 PM Kitsune has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3482 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 7 of 49 (429733)
10-21-2007 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Kitsune
10-21-2007 1:50 PM


Just remember that the topic is about whether vaccination is consistent with Naturopathic philosophy.
Keep in line with that and don't get sidetracked into the old topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Kitsune, posted 10-21-2007 1:50 PM Kitsune has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Kitsune, posted 10-21-2007 3:39 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
Kitsune
Member (Idle past 4325 days)
Posts: 788
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 09-16-2007


Message 8 of 49 (429734)
10-21-2007 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by purpledawn
10-21-2007 3:12 PM


Glad to hear it. I am now allowed to cite some evidence from naturopathic sites

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by purpledawn, posted 10-21-2007 3:12 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 9 of 49 (429764)
10-21-2007 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by purpledawn
10-21-2007 12:05 PM


Re: Fillers and Ingredients
quote:
As I understand it the problem isn't with the concept of a vaccine, but the additional fillers and ingredients and how they may impact developing bodies.
If the concern is about unknown potentially harmful ingredients in vaccines, then why do naturopaths prescribe herbal drugs which have unknown potentially harmful ingredients?
Just becasue something is "natural" doesn't mean it isn't potentially harmful.
quote:
Are the antibodies produced by vaccines effective as long term as those naturally developed?
Of course they are, since the body doesn't know the difference between the protein coat on a weakened or killed virus compared to a live, virulent virus. It is similar to a lock not knowing the difference if the key used in it is red or blue.
If there was a significant difference, don't you think we would have noticed it over the last century and a half?
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by purpledawn, posted 10-21-2007 12:05 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by purpledawn, posted 10-21-2007 6:45 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 10 of 49 (429773)
10-21-2007 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Kitsune
10-21-2007 1:10 PM


quote:
Actually, part of the philosophy of naturopathy is to only put into the body that which belongs there, examples of this being food, vitamins, and essential fatty acids.
So, how do herbal drugs fit into this philosophy?
Herbal drugs are drugs, not food, vitamins, or fatty acids.
quote:
If a disease is contracted by a healthy person with adequate nutritional and vitamin intake, its course should be benign.
Of course, this is bullshit. It depends upon the disease.
The Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918 killed millions, a large number of whom were perfectly healthy people in the prime of life.
from the wiki
The 1918 flu pandemic, commonly referred to as the Spanish flu, was a category 5 influenza pandemic caused by an unusually severe and deadly Influenza A virus strain of subtype H1N1. Many of its victims were healthy young adults, in contrast to most influenza outbreaks which predominantly affect juvenile, elderly, or otherwise weakened patients.
The Spanish flu pandemic lasted from 1918 to 1919, spreading even to the Arctic and remote Pacific islands. While older estimates put the number of killed at 40-50 million people, current estimates are that 50 million to 100 million people worldwide died, possibly more than that taken by the Black Death. This extraordinary toll resulted from the extremely high infection rate of up to 50% and the extreme severity of the symptoms, suspected to be caused by cytokine storms. Between 2 and 20% of those infected by Spanish flu died, as opposed to the normal flu epidemic mortality rate of 0.1%. Unusually, the epidemic mostly killed young adults, with 99% of pandemic influenza deaths occurring in people under 65, and more than half in young adults 20 to 40 years old.
quote:
You say that in order to gain natural immunity to a pathogen, a person has to "suffer through the disease." As I stated above, if the person is well nourished, there is no reason why there should have to be suffering.
Look, I rarely get sick as an adult. Maybe one or two little 4 day colds a year. At most. I never get a flu shot.
Pretty much the only times I have gotten meaningfully sick in the past couple of decades is from exposure to particularly bad viruses, often when I have traveled a distance and come into a new "viral landscape", like at the holidays or a long-distance get-together.
It didn't matter that I maintain a healthy diet. I didn't have the antibodies to those viruses, so my healthy, prime-of-life body got sick.
Your philosophy ignores a vast amount of contrary evidence, and as such is not based in reality.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Kitsune, posted 10-21-2007 1:10 PM Kitsune has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by NosyNed, posted 10-21-2007 6:16 PM nator has not replied
 Message 15 by Kitsune, posted 10-22-2007 4:01 AM nator has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 11 of 49 (429784)
10-21-2007 6:16 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by nator
10-21-2007 5:56 PM


cytokine storms
suspected to be caused by cytokine storms.
In fact, you didn't highlight the most important bit -- above.
A cytokine storm is the result of a very strong immune reaction. It is suggested that the high death rate among the apparently most healthy was precisely because they had strong immune systems. It was the immune reaction which killed them.
I'm not sure how this works when someone is vaccinated and immunized against such a disease agent. I presume the immune system attacks the invader when there are few of them so the total reaction isn't as intense. In an immunized individual the immune reaction can't kick in fast enough; the invader multiples tremendously and the immune response is correspondingly over-the-top.
Edited by NosyNed, : grammar and spellin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by nator, posted 10-21-2007 5:56 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Kitsune, posted 10-22-2007 4:36 AM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 18 by Kitsune, posted 10-22-2007 7:31 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3482 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 12 of 49 (429788)
10-21-2007 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by nator
10-21-2007 5:31 PM


Re: Fillers and Ingredients
quote:
If the concern is about unknown potentially harmful ingredients in vaccines, then why do naturopaths prescribe herbal drugs which have unknown potentially harmful ingredients?
Remember in the naturopathic field they don't feel that the herbs are truly untested or harmful if used correctly.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by nator, posted 10-21-2007 5:31 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Rrhain, posted 10-21-2007 8:45 PM purpledawn has not replied
 Message 14 by Percy, posted 10-21-2007 9:15 PM purpledawn has replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 13 of 49 (429805)
10-21-2007 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by purpledawn
10-21-2007 6:45 PM


Re: Fillers and Ingredients
purpledawn rights:
quote:
Remember in the naturopathic field they don't feel that the herbs are truly untested or harmful if used correctly.
Special pleading. The vaccines have been truly tested and shown not to be harmful if used correctly.
If it's good enough for them, why is the more rigorous process of an actual double-blind study not good enough?

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by purpledawn, posted 10-21-2007 6:45 PM purpledawn has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Kitsune, posted 10-22-2007 8:19 AM Rrhain has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22489
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.0


Message 14 of 49 (429812)
10-21-2007 9:15 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by purpledawn
10-21-2007 6:45 PM


Re: Fillers and Ingredients
purpledawn writes:
Remember in the naturopathic field they don't feel that the herbs are truly untested or harmful if used correctly.
It is appropriate to ask how they come by this feeling that herbs aren't untested, or aren't harmful is used correctly, or even how they know what "used correctly" means.
Most herbs, nutritional supplements and vitamins do not fall under the auspices of the FDA, which requires rigorous testing (sometimes taking up to a decade) before drugs can be prescribed by trained professionals usually known as doctors who receive years of training (around a decade). It is through this testing that we know the safety and efficacy of FDA approved drugs.
Though herbs, nutritional supplements and vitamins are not completely untested, what testing is done isn't governed by any body like the FDA but is often just whatever testing researchers might decide to do (usually those with a stake in their sales), plus much of the testing is of poor quality. So okay, they're tested, but not very well.
You have to ask yourself why you place greater trust in alternatives with the least scientific assurance of safety and efficacy.
The world is full of things that are good for us and bad for us. The definition of "good for us" is not "anything that is natural," whatever that means anyway. By the time your herbs, nutritional supplements and vitamins are on store shelves, I'm not sure how "natural" many of them are. Why manufactured over the counter pills are "natural" while manufactured prescription pills aren't is beyond me.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by purpledawn, posted 10-21-2007 6:45 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by purpledawn, posted 10-22-2007 7:00 AM Percy has replied

  
Kitsune
Member (Idle past 4325 days)
Posts: 788
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 09-16-2007


Message 15 of 49 (429861)
10-22-2007 4:01 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by nator
10-21-2007 5:56 PM


So, how do herbal drugs fit into this philosophy?
First, not all naturopaths use them. If you look at Dr. Saul's website, he makes no mention of them.
Second, herbs in general have a much longer track record than allopathic drugs. For some, such as Ayurvedic herbs, you can look at a history of thousands of years of usage. Conversely, the FDA will rubber-stamp a drug for approval after trials that are typically short -- often just a few weeks -- and the population becomes the lab rats for the long-term efficacy of these drugs. You might have heard of some of these:
Ketek: an antibiotic which received a black box warning this year after it was found to be 3-11 times more likely than other antibiotics to cause acute liver failure
Vioxx: an antiarthritis drug recalled this year. It was found to double the risk of heart attack in those who took it for 18 months or longer. It has been taken by an estimated 84 million people since its release in 1999.
This data is from here, where you can read all about the unintended effects of drugs that were approved by the FDA and marketed to the public.
If a herb were causing the sorts of problems that these drugs have, don't you think there'd be uproar? Don't you think there are people wanting to sell their own drugs who are waiting for a reason to legally eliminate their competition? They'd jump like a pack of wolves. I continually wonder why people here are so worried about the effects of herbs with a long track record of safety, when nothing is said about the dangers of the medications your doctor is giving you.
If you have type II diabetes -- well, the first thing you need to do is address your diet. But if you were to take a medication as well, you could supplement with vanadium, chromium and biotin, and cinnamon, as a few examples. Or you could decide to take drugs such as the sulfonylureas (side effects can include hypoglycemia and weight gain), meglitinides (similar side effects to the former), biguanides (side effects can include gastrointestinal distress and diarrhoea; one drug called Metformin is contraindicated in patients with congestive heart failure, unstable heart disease, hypoxic lung disease or advanced age), and thiazolidediones (can cause liver damage, the symptoms of which are nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, fatigue, anorexia and dark urine; a drug in this class was taken off the market due to reports of liver damage). What would you opt for? Have you ever had any ill effects from cinnamon? Has anyone you know? Perhaps this meagre anecdotal evidence is not enough for you, and we need randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials to establish its safety?
This article gives details about a herb called chaparral, and the fallacious reasons why the FDA had claimed that it is toxic. As you can see, the cases of toxicity were complicated by a variety of factors. This herb has actually been used by millions of people with no complications.
As far as your stories of "healthy" people who have been susceptible to disease are concerned, I would ask you to re-read my previous post. Look at what I said about the necessity of high levels of vitamin C. Do you megadose? Did the people in the influenza outbreak megadose? Also look at the work of Weston A. Price and what he found about the diets of indigenous people -- and how they became prone to disease in a single generation when they switched to a modern Western-style diet.
You need to try to understand naturopathy, and what is meant by a good diet and supplement regime, a little better before you give more examples of "healthy" people getting disease.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by nator, posted 10-21-2007 5:56 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by nator, posted 10-22-2007 7:35 AM Kitsune has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024