Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why only one Grand Canyon
IrishRockhound
Member (Idle past 4463 days)
Posts: 569
From: Ireland
Joined: 05-19-2003


Message 3 of 85 (148648)
10-09-2004 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by tsig
10-08-2004 10:54 PM


A worldwide flood could not have produced the Grand Canyon, so the point is somewhat moot.
This is one of the biggest problems for the flood. For something that was supposed to be global in scope, it left close to zero geological evidence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by tsig, posted 10-08-2004 10:54 PM tsig has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by tsig, posted 10-09-2004 11:49 AM IrishRockhound has not replied

  
IrishRockhound
Member (Idle past 4463 days)
Posts: 569
From: Ireland
Joined: 05-19-2003


Message 6 of 85 (148676)
10-09-2004 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by roxrkool
10-09-2004 12:19 PM


Ah, speculative geology. No wonder YEC geologists are rare. Trying to fool oneself is practically a prerequisite.
Explaining away the Grand Canyon as a result of the flood is relatively simple; however I'd love to see anyone try to explain away Ireland or Scotland in the same fashion. The sheer effort of resolving so much conflicting evidence would make their head explode.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by roxrkool, posted 10-09-2004 12:19 PM roxrkool has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by roxrkool, posted 10-10-2004 1:32 AM IrishRockhound has not replied
 Message 9 by roxrkool, posted 10-10-2004 1:32 AM IrishRockhound has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024