Solving the Mystery of the Biblical Flood

"The biblical flood is a myth, just like the tower of babble and santa claus."
--I already showed you why the Tower of Babbel is not myth here:--Post #87 - Evolution is a religion. Creation is a religion:

quote:

---

​

--I already gave evidence (actually we can go and see the tower today) of the Tower of Babel, the bible is completelly accurate on this point: From another forum, posted by myself in response to another asserting the same:

​

[Quote] --Why would you assert something so untrue? The tower of bable has been found.
http://artiom.home.mindspring.com/gumilev/ch4.htm

​

[Quote] The only thing the Bible believers have to go on is the obscure references of the tower of Babel...which incidently was never discovered,either intact or in ruins and dont tell me that it was the alledged Flood since it occured after the flood in biblical mythology and the yet unproven assertion,both in fact and in theory that the oceans all dried up after the alledged flood.

---

--And this is a link with the discussion of the Tower of Babel and Ziggurats.
-- TOWER OF BABEL - Is there archaeological evidence of the Tower of Babel? - ChristianAnswers.Net------------------

​

[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 02-15-2002]

(Sorry Wmscott, I don't want to try and stray your debate in here, I just had to reply to quicksink on this one)"Creationists - According to Genesis chapter one, Which was created first, male or female?""Are you saying that the Biblical Tower of Babel definitely existed"
--Yeah."in the circumstances described in the Bible
of a nature as described in the Bible
and with consequences as described in the Bible"
--My argument is that it existed, I can't prove that God interveined and created various languages so the people could not understand each other or something of the like."and that the link you give provides evidence of this?"
--Is there something it is missing?"If so, do you apply the same standards of evidence to your assessments of the evidence for evolution?"
--What would you mean? Also, I don't think I could be in a position to refute Evolution, I am more here to defend creationism as I know more in that catagory, and to really refute Evolution, it requires emense knowledge that I do not have as of yet in most areas.------------------

"REPONSE: Somehow I doubt that you cannot prove that god intervened."
--If you can show me a potential falsification on this, then I would go at it, but I know of none."After all, you can't PROVE that god made the great flood (if it existed)."
--Exactly."I think that you don't want to defend it all, as it is such nonsense."
--I already have, the problem is, it requires potential falsification to be defended at all within the scientific realm."Today we have interplanetary missions. the votagers are beyond Pluto. When's god going to stop those?"
--Theres no reason to stop them."RESPONSE: TC- you can't have it both ways. If you defend creationism, you are falsifying evolution."
--No your not, If I am defending creationism, I am showing that the Creationist theories are valid and plausable, If I were to attempt to falsify Evolution, I have to show that it is not compatable with the evidence, different concepts."The two simply cannot exist. So if you're hear to defend creationism, you better be ready to push evolution back."
--I don't need to be.------------------

"I think the creationists will have a fun time with this."
--I know I will See post #23 in 'How old is the earth', we can continue discussion there instead of straying the subject in WmScots thread. I would also like to discuss any of your other potential evidences.------------------

​

[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 02-16-2002]

Poor Brad, I think we give him too many 'flat tires' sometimes. We luv ya anyways brad. Just don't let your keyboard catch fire now ------------------

Oh no, don't scare me like that Master P ------------------