Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,778 Year: 4,035/9,624 Month: 906/974 Week: 233/286 Day: 40/109 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The beginning of the jihad in Europe?
mikehager
Member (Idle past 6493 days)
Posts: 534
Joined: 09-02-2004


Message 54 of 301 (257835)
11-08-2005 2:42 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by CanadianSteve
11-08-2005 2:18 PM


Re: Did I call it, or what?
far more than most, I provide reason for my postions rather than assertions. In fact, it is often those baseless assertions, like that Christian fundamentalists and Islamists are one and the same, that i chalk up to moral relativism.
This is a bald-faced lie when one considers the contents of this thread. You made the accusation of "moral relativism" (which I am not sure is a bad thing in any case) in reference to certain posters, paraphrasing them to say that "Christian fundamentalists and Islamists are one and the same..."
You have given no defense. You have made an unsupported assertion and acted offended when people didn't accept it. This is the act of a petulant child, not a defense.
I don't care to see a defense, having read your nonsense before, I just wanted to let you know that it is easy to see through your ham-handed equivocations. Jar is right to disregard you, as I am going to go back to doing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by CanadianSteve, posted 11-08-2005 2:18 PM CanadianSteve has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by CanadianSteve, posted 11-08-2005 2:48 PM mikehager has replied

mikehager
Member (Idle past 6493 days)
Posts: 534
Joined: 09-02-2004


Message 74 of 301 (257885)
11-08-2005 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by CanadianSteve
11-08-2005 2:48 PM


Re: Did I call it, or what?
This is another fine example of the emptiness of your positions, CS. I took you to task for making unsupported assertions in this thread. You jump to what you think is my "orhtodoxy".
How very amusing. Don't try to define "Moral Relativism" in a usable way. Don't support your claims. Don't offer to start another thread, since this is off topic, where these things can be done. Just make a stupid accusation and dance laughingly on.
Oh, and to actually reply, since all I was discussing was the unsupported nature of your argument, that must be the orthodoxy you refer to. Thus. yes. I do dislike challenges to the idea of actually making an argument rather than simply saying things and expecting them to be believed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by CanadianSteve, posted 11-08-2005 2:48 PM CanadianSteve has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by CanadianSteve, posted 11-08-2005 6:29 PM mikehager has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024