Author
|
Topic: Young earth explanations for Angular Unconformities
|
jar
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 23 of 202 (418297)
08-27-2007 11:08 AM
|
Reply to: Message 22 by Ihategod 08-27-2007 9:28 AM
|
|
Re: compelled to reply
How does your model explain the Great Unconformity between the Vishnu Schist and the Tapeats Limestone? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to: | | Message 22 by Ihategod, posted 08-27-2007 9:28 AM | | Ihategod has not replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 27 of 202 (418390)
08-27-2007 11:15 PM
|
Reply to: Message 26 by Ihategod 08-27-2007 11:10 PM
|
|
Re: ......
How does your model explain the Great Unconformity between the Vishnu Schist and the Tapeats Limestone? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to: | | Message 26 by Ihategod, posted 08-27-2007 11:10 PM | | Ihategod has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 29 by Ihategod, posted 08-27-2007 11:25 PM | | jar has replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 30 of 202 (418396)
08-27-2007 11:29 PM
|
Reply to: Message 29 by Ihategod 08-27-2007 11:25 PM
|
|
Great Unconformity.
Jar asked:
How does your model explain the Great Unconformity between the Vishnu Schist and the Tapeats Limestone? to which Vashgun replied:
quote: Lets see, a lot of water.
Okay. So let me make sure I understand. You are claiming that the material that is missing in the Great Unconformity was washed away? Is that correct so far? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to: | | Message 29 by Ihategod, posted 08-27-2007 11:25 PM | | Ihategod has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 32 by Ihategod, posted 08-27-2007 11:33 PM | | jar has replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 34 of 202 (418406)
08-27-2007 11:54 PM
|
Reply to: Message 32 by Ihategod 08-27-2007 11:33 PM
|
|
Re: Great Unconformity.
Jar asked:
Okay. So let me make sure I understand. You are claiming that the material that is missing in the Great Unconformity was washed away? Is that correct so far? to which Vashgun replied:
quote: My first reaction is to say no, but that's just for the sake of arguing. So I'll say yes to traverse further down this rabbit trail in the hopes of learning something.
Well either answer would do, all I am looking for is the model YOU present to explain the reality that is seen. Right now all we are doing is searching for YOUR model. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to: | | Message 32 by Ihategod, posted 08-27-2007 11:33 PM | | Ihategod has not replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 39 of 202 (418722)
08-29-2007 11:38 PM
|
Reply to: Message 38 by Ihategod 08-29-2007 11:30 PM
|
|
Re: Learn more
Once more I make an offer. Would you be interested in walking through some real life examples and explaining how the "Flood model" might explain them? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to: | | Message 38 by Ihategod, posted 08-29-2007 11:30 PM | | Ihategod has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 40 by Ihategod, posted 08-29-2007 11:49 PM | | jar has replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 41 of 202 (418726)
08-29-2007 11:51 PM
|
Reply to: Message 40 by Ihategod 08-29-2007 11:49 PM
|
|
Re: Learn more
So you are afraid or unwilling to walk through some real life examples and show us how the Flood Model could explain what is seen. That is as expected. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to: | | Message 40 by Ihategod, posted 08-29-2007 11:49 PM | | Ihategod has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 43 by Ihategod, posted 08-30-2007 11:52 PM | | jar has replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 45 of 202 (418895)
08-30-2007 11:57 PM
|
Reply to: Message 43 by Ihategod 08-30-2007 11:52 PM
|
|
Re: Learn more
Actually, if there is some Flood Model, you should be able to use it to explain what is seen. Again, I am willing to step through what is really there and let you show how the Flood Model can explain it. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to: | | Message 43 by Ihategod, posted 08-30-2007 11:52 PM | | Ihategod has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 46 by Ihategod, posted 08-31-2007 12:05 AM | | jar has replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 47 of 202 (418897)
08-31-2007 12:22 AM
|
Reply to: Message 46 by Ihategod 08-31-2007 12:05 AM
|
|
Re: Learn more
The offer still stands. If there is a Flood Model it should be able to explain what is seen. As a very devout Christian I invite you to step through and show how the Flood Model can explain reality. That is after all, the topic of this thread. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to: | | Message 46 by Ihategod, posted 08-31-2007 12:05 AM | | Ihategod has not replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 57 of 202 (421188)
09-11-2007 12:48 PM
|
Reply to: Message 56 by bdfoster 09-11-2007 12:40 PM
|
|
Re: They're everywhere
He may also be assuming that just because the ones that have been shown are all relatively near the surface that all are near the surface. I would suggest trying to find out what HE thinks an unconformity is and what the model is for creating an unconformity. Then step on to an angular unconformity. Then move on to show that there can be a whole series of unconformities in a geological column. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to: | | Message 56 by bdfoster, posted 09-11-2007 12:40 PM | | bdfoster has not replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 190 of 202 (796837)
01-05-2017 8:40 AM
|
Reply to: Message 189 by Percy 01-05-2017 8:19 AM
|
|
Re: The decrepitude of both upper and lower blocks of strata
Percy writes: Faith writes: Erosion removed the weathered material....How do you know that? It couldn't be any other way. Very small weathered material has been carried away by wind and water. Larger material is still there at the base of the cliff face where it accumulates as minor scree or talus but is eventually weathered itself into smaller particles and is carried away, or perhaps becomes part of the ground. Have you considered other ways the material might have been removed like geologists taking samples away or tourists taking mementos away or pixie dust?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 189 by Percy, posted 01-05-2017 8:19 AM | | Percy has seen this message but not replied |
|