Young earth explanations for Angular Unconformities

Are you being sarcastic?Take a bucket of water, drop in a few handfuls of sand, then a few hand fulls of gravel.Does the sand and the gravel stand up never to each other in long flat boards or do they lay on the bottom of the bucket?Now try it 10,000,000 more times. See if you get your desired results even 1x. (hint: you won't).This sort of experiment is (theoritcally) not beyond the capabilities of YECs. Why they haven't bothered to experiment in this way is still beyond the rest of us.

"stand up *next* to each other" I was typing fast and didn't see the mistake.Here's a tip for you though.Any time you link "answersingenesis" it's tantamount to giving up on these threads. Every point they've made there has been shown to not only be false but deliberately deceiving.It's one thing to spout your own uneducated garbage, but when you spout someone else's you're really being a mule.The question you should be asking is why the AIG crowd are knowingly misleading you. We know they are wrong, they know they are wrong, the only person who doesn't know they are wrong is you. Feel like the butt of the joke?

Excuse me, but WHAT?Look, we've addressed "AIG links" literally THOUSANDS of times on the threads. The story is always the same:Creationist shows up. Creationist links AIG, (always AIG) and claims it disproves reality. One of us then has to go through the labor of showing once again that the link in question is a bunch of lies. This is the absolute essence of PRATT.It's one thing for a Creationist to show up here spouting stuff they learned in "school" or stuff they "figured out on their own". Ignorance is not a crime, it's just indicative of insufficient education.However the people at AIG aren't just ignorant. They KNOW that what they are saying is lies. They know because they've been shown in excruciating detail exactly why each and every one of their posts is fraudulent. Not once, not twice, but thousands and thousands of times.They are quite simply liars.And anyone continue to spout the AIG's uneducated garbage is just spreading around the crap.Debate is not simply linking a website and saying QED. If that's acceptable, then I suggest we close down the boards entirely and just post two links in their place - AIG and a refutation, since that's all we'd be doing here anyway.

Linking AIG is not making a claim. It's linking someone else's claim. And in this case, you are linking a claim which has already been addressed thousands of times.For more information, pick any thread on this board dealing with evolution and read it. Eventually you will find someone linking AIG and someone explaining once again why everything there is a bald faced lie.