AIG writes:
Or am I just misreading your post and missing the ironic parody?
It was half in jest.
The half in jest is how I have seen some YECs declare victory wihout even addressing the evidence.
The half not in jest is about how I have not seen any YEC remotely able to explain angular unconformities.
Should have used one of these guys
to avoid confusion.
Edited by anglagard, : No reason given.