Faith msg 101 writes:
just soft enough not to be brittle but solid enough to break into pieces will do it just fine.
So, somewhere on the hardness and tensile strength scales, then? Any idea what the readings would be?
the tectonic pressure should have had the effect of hardening the rock at the same time it folded it.
Are there some references in physics, chemistry, and geology that would explain your reasoning here?
because in the enormous time spans described by standard theory the lower section of Siccar and Mt. Rushmore too, shouldn't be holding up well at all.
Why wouldn't they have held up exactly as they have? Can you show any tests that have been done and reported in the scientific literature that shows there is something odd about the lower sections of Siccar and Mt. Rushmore?
There must be some evidence that you are interpreting to reach these conclusions.
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
™ Version 4.2
