I think you're right, I should have supported my statement with evidence, but I didn't think it needed proving. In the beginning, I thought most would agree.
Ah, well. You'd be surprised at what people disagree on. There were a fair selection of items on your list that I would disagree with, in fact (assuming the list you posted represented "bad" things). However, I have to confess I'm very disinclined to argue about them without you at least putting down some initial reasoning on each.
Never take agreement for granted - this is a debate board, after all. If you want to convince people with the force of your argument, you need to present it in a persuasive fashion. Not everyone is going to see the world the way you do.
You know how I have been saying how it's not about Adam Smith and stuff. Maybe it's not clear, I'm not sure. It's like a poem I guess like cartman said.
Yeah, I kind of took it that way, seeing as none of the items on your list can actually be laid at Smith's doorstep. In spite of the popular, grossly over-simplified exposure most people get, many of his ideas are actually quite good - and often very different from what is usually encapsulated. I found
Wealth to be a fascinating read - even if I don't necessarily agree with everything. Rather than rejecting it wholesale, it might be worth the effort to wade through his writings. Just a thought.