Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,832 Year: 4,089/9,624 Month: 960/974 Week: 287/286 Day: 8/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   2004 Summer Olympics
Phat
Member
Posts: 18343
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 82 of 109 (671149)
08-22-2012 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by dronestar
08-21-2012 9:11 AM


Re: OK, the 2012 London Olympics are over . . .
I am highly doubting the Olympics have positively affected MOST of the six (7?) billion inhabitants of the world. Instead, I see it as a wasted opportunity to help impoverished lives via medicine or just clean water. I can't imagine any of the three thousand children who die EVERY day from malnutrition as really being positively impacted by any country hosting the Olympics.
Explain to me how we would be able to raise the money to help these impoverished lives? Reality suggests that humans dont simply hand over their financial resources to help anyone...at least not on a grand scale. Sponsoring art or sport, however, gathers quite a few more donors.
How would the human race and human experience suffer if the olympics were canceled?
Perhaps not a lot, on a global scale. But if evry sporting event were cancelled and people had no diversions, I seriously doubt if we would simply spend money feeding people.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by dronestar, posted 08-21-2012 9:11 AM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by dronestar, posted 08-22-2012 5:18 PM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024