|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,767 Year: 4,024/9,624 Month: 895/974 Week: 222/286 Day: 29/109 Hour: 2/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.4 |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Pre-flood physics? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eta_Carinae Member (Idle past 4400 days) Posts: 547 From: US Joined: |
Eta_Carinae, I would assume that they are more into the study of the sun, since the russian scientist finding were confirmed by the british scientists, although core harmonics, don't believe its changed, the core of the sun gives off the same harmonics that its core density is evidence of a very young star, think due to the closeness of the sun they are also studying the outer surface higher occilations harmonics, and other things like them neutrinoes in coal mines, though all these other things doesn't change the core harmonics, etc...the sun gives off light particles and leaves the dense particles behind, is not this what the density of the core is all about, white dwarfs, etc... P.S. Is not the core harmonics occilations what they are using to study other stars in the known universe, all we can say is the sun is a very young star, I realize to the evolution people tends to exagerate when it come to the age of the sun, like moon rocks that dated 5 billion years old, doesn't mean the sun was a star, 5 billion years ago, all we know is that God created the heaven in the beginning and if the sun was 5 billion years old a star its core harmonics should be a whole lot deeper, and should be giving off a whole lot more neutrinoes, etc... More GARBAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You might want to re-evaluate the neutrino thing. Already been solved! The Sun is approx. 4.6 Gyr old. You have no clue (or the person you are quoting) about stellar physics.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eta_Carinae Member (Idle past 4400 days) Posts: 547 From: US Joined: |
Arrgh - double post (first time I have ever done that.
[This message has been edited by Eta_Carinae, 12-22-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.4 |
Could I post a vain request that we return to the topic originally posed. Please explain how the physcis allowed for no rainbows?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
johnfolton  Suspended Member (Idle past 5617 days) Posts: 2024 Joined: |
Coragyps, Its interesting that granite is lighter than basalt, however, on the continents this granite mantle is 5 to 10 miles thick, even so, the basalt lavas being heavier are not likely to be as thick as the under laminate layer of granite, with the weight of the water and the effect of the gravitation of the moon, the mid-ocean ridges rose, as the floating ocean mantle gravitated to a stop, after crushing the granite under the continents forming the trenches. If I remember Walt theory the water under the granite mantle is what erupted out of the earth, this water was (trapped) between the granite and the basalt inner earth layer(hydro-plate theory), that the basalt mid-ocean ridges were actually the inner basalt being pressed up, after the above granite mantle had eroded away, the reason for with you have the springs of the ocean (hydro-thermal vents on each side of the mid-ocean ridges, the theory says their is still water compressed under the granite, being pressed out, kind of like a pressure relief valve on a hot water tank, however these thermal vents are venting continually.
P.S. Due to the cavitation erosion of the granite layer, the theory goes that the basalt lava's also outpoured over the entire oceans floor, covering the entire ocean floor. Walts theory can be understood better if one moves a refrigerator with compressed air, the refrigerator float's, this is the reason the kola russian deep well is studying the relationship of fluid mechanics in relation to crustal earthquake movement. I personally don't see how the techtonic plates could float on lava, but can see how the malleability of the inner earth molten lavas basalt's could be molded by the fractured rock and water pressing down by hydraulics, and the mid-ocean ridges rising, and the tidal effects pressing down on the fractured rock and water through weight of the oceans, basalt pressing down on the granite and the waters trapped between pressing down on the malleable inner earth, causing the continental mountains, pressing up, even up until this day. Its believed that there was once a land bridge to Australia, that has since sunk below the wave base, the pressing down of the oceans and the pressing up of the mountains, kjv psalm 104:9, God set the bounds so the water would never again cover the entire earth, etc...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
johnfolton  Suspended Member (Idle past 5617 days) Posts: 2024 Joined: |
Eta_Carinae, I kind of figured the neutrinoes were being formed by the sun, now I'm not into stellar physics, but what does neutrinoes have to do with the core harmonics of the sun, is the sun burning from the core or from the surface, my leaning is that the core harmonics indicate its core density is that of a young star,though you probably would agree by saying 4.6 billion years is a young star, though I think if the sun was that old its core would of compressed, more than what the deeper harmonics of the sun which are indicating the suns core is not all that dense, etc...
P.S. Its like your all saying because neutrinoes are being given off the sun's core is not getting denser, like what makes a star turn into a black hole, is it not compressing, as the light is given off, over time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
johnfolton  Suspended Member (Idle past 5617 days) Posts: 2024 Joined: |
Mr.Jack, To rain you need a speck of dust, it sounds like in Noahs say it never rained, it talks about water above the firmament and water below the firmament kjv genesis 1:7-8, I take the firmament to be where the birds fly kjv genesis 1:20, so a water canopy above where the bird's flew, which changed after the biblical flood, the ash and the temperature of the water being release opened the windows of heaven, causing the rain to come down. It says God stopped the fountains of the deep and the windows of heaven and the rain from heaven was restrained. kjv genesis 8:2.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 760 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
Whatever, I think I now see where you got your screen name. You just post whatever....
What does the Sun have to do with black holes? You are unaware, I suppose, that only stars of about eight times the Sun's mass end up as black holes? And that stars have to weigh quite a bit more than the sun to even end up as neutron stars? And that stars are powered by nuclear fusion? C'mon.... |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 760 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
the theory goes that the basalt lava's also outpoured over the entire oceans floor, covering the entire ocean floor.
Boiling the oceans, adding even more heat than that contributed by all that 800-degree steam bursting forth. Can't you see how absurd all this is?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: |
quote: This is your punishment, for supplying such a vague topic title. That said, we can try to get back to the rainbow. Whatever, might you be interested in taking your side-topic to a new topic (one with a quality topic title). And try to improve your writting quality. As it is, I must judge it as being pretty much babble. Adminnemooseus ------------------Comments on moderation procedures? - Go to Change in Moderation? or too fast closure of threads
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
sidelined Member (Idle past 5934 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
Mr Jack
In Gen 9:14 it states "And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud:" Since we often see a cloud overhead without a rainbow present we can safely conclude that the literal interpretaton here does not hold and any change in the physics of the rainbow do not have merit. ------------------"I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it is much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong." R.P. Feynman [This message has been edited by sidelined, 12-23-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
johnfolton  Suspended Member (Idle past 5617 days) Posts: 2024 Joined: |
Coragyps, You all have no idea how old the sun is, given the earth is too watery, to have been formed as a molten ball of fire, you can not assume that just because they dated rocks on the moon to be 4.6 billion years old, that the sun has been a star this long, thats like dating the fossils imprints by the sediments that preserved the imprints (proven wrong by Dr. Andrew Snelling), likely the sun has only been a star 13,000 years. I do find it interesting that evolutionists are always dating a rock, and making this leap of faith, that this means the fossils that are buried are as old as the rock sediments, as far as the sun, the evolutionists dated the age of the sun, using a moon rock and say, see, the sun is at least as old as this rock. The bible says God made the heaven and the earth in the beginning, this means its possible this happened 4.6 billion years ago, or longer in relation to the other stars(light takes how many light years to reach the earth), but the sun has only been a star, biblically 13,000 years ago(depending on how you interprete a creation day), and the core harmonics of the sun, is evidence it really is a very young star, granted it will probably never end up a black hole, but this does not mean its core is not compressing, as neutrons, protons, are left behind, etc...
P.S. Given the earth is a watery world, and the evidence that even the polar regions were tropical, it makes sense if it didn't rain the clouds would of rose as a canopy high in the sky. Whatever, the theory goes that the basalt lava's also outpoured over the entire oceans floor, covering the entire ocean floor. Coragyps, Boiling the oceans, adding even more heat than that contributed by all that 800-degree steam bursting forth. Can't you see how absurd all this is? Whatever, Yep, it does sound absurd, this is why I'm interested if they have profile dated the entire basalt ocean floor, if all dates the same age, not getting progressively older, then the lava outpoured suddenly, but then again were talking a whole lot of water to mitigate the temps, and with all the snow coming down forming the glaciers, suddenly, but even so, it would be interesting to see some scientific study that says that they have dated the basalt oceans floor, an age profile across the entire oceans floor, that confirms one way or the other if the basalt was laid down suddenly, or over hundreds of millions of years. [This message has been edited by whatever, 12-23-2003] [This message has been edited by whatever, 12-23-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 760 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
you can not assume that just because they dated rocks on the moon to be 4.6 billion years old, that the sun has been a star this long, Doesn't Genesis have the Sun and Moon both being created on the Fourth Day? Snelling would say so - heck, he's probably "proved" it!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 760 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
whatever, try Home Page for starters - there are several other lines of evidence for the ages of ocean crust.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
truthlover Member (Idle past 4085 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: |
Brown is utterly full of crap - he makes all that nonsense up. You should stop beating around the bush. Could you make your position on this topic clear? :-P edited: had to fix my quote codes again. [This message has been edited by truthlover, 12-23-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
truthlover Member (Idle past 4085 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: |
Since we often see a cloud overhead without a rainbow present we can safely conclude that the literal interpretaton here does not hold and any change in the physics of the rainbow do not have merit. Great point. Maybe this will just end the whole issue and eliminate the need for whatever's incomprehensible posts.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024