Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 87 (8993 total)
76 online now:
14174dm, DrJones*, dwise1, kjsimons (4 members, 72 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,204 Year: 10,952/23,288 Month: 204/1,763 Week: 171/390 Day: 60/32 Hour: 0/1

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Tribute Thread for the Recently Passed Greats
Larni
Member
Posts: 3997
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 66 of 882 (501114)
03-04-2009 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Modulous
03-04-2009 10:59 AM


Re: Philip José Farmer
I wonder who he will bump into on the River?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Modulous, posted 03-04-2009 10:59 AM Modulous has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Theodoric, posted 03-04-2009 12:16 PM Larni has not yet responded

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 3997
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 150 of 882 (645601)
12-28-2011 10:52 AM
Reply to: Message 149 by dronestar
12-28-2011 8:58 AM


Re: Cheeta the Chimp, dies at 80
Is that the chimp from Tarzan?

I'm amazed it lived that long (and secretly appalled as I detest all chimps).


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by dronestar, posted 12-28-2011 8:58 AM dronestar has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by dronestar, posted 12-28-2011 11:31 AM Larni has responded

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 3997
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 152 of 882 (645609)
12-28-2011 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 151 by dronestar
12-28-2011 11:31 AM


Re: Cheeta the Chimp, dies at 80
Why do you detest chimps?

I think they get a too good profile in the media. They really are nasty bastards but people think their 'so great'.

They have male cohorts that roam about the place attacking and eating monkeys and brutalising other cartloads of chimps.

They ruin tea parties.

I don't like how strong they are or the mean look older males get in their eye when they see something they want to take from you.

Compared to bonobos (with whom I only have mild distaste) they are aggressive, brutal, godless animals.

But it boils down to them getting better press than they deserve.

Funnily enough my wife feels the same way about dolphins.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by dronestar, posted 12-28-2011 11:31 AM dronestar has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by dronestar, posted 12-28-2011 12:06 PM Larni has not yet responded

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 3997
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(2)
Message 684 of 882 (843082)
11-13-2018 4:31 AM
Reply to: Message 683 by xongsmith
11-12-2018 2:22 PM


Re: Stan Lee, 95
Such a creative guy.

My younger self looked up and wanted to be just like his best creation Spider-man.

As such he’s in some small way responsible for my moral compass, love of quips and overcoming my childhood fear of spiders.

Nuff said.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 683 by xongsmith, posted 11-12-2018 2:22 PM xongsmith has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 687 by ramoss, posted 11-25-2018 6:06 PM Larni has responded

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 3997
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 688 of 882 (844152)
11-26-2018 2:48 AM
Reply to: Message 687 by ramoss
11-25-2018 6:06 PM


Re: Stan Lee, 95
That’s awesome.

What was the book about?


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 687 by ramoss, posted 11-25-2018 6:06 PM ramoss has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 690 by ramoss, posted 01-17-2019 11:42 AM Larni has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020