iano writes:
From which stone did you lick this notion
From my interpretation of this:
iano writes:
Which is a succinct way of saying that any love we might have for him subsequent to his being made manifest would have trouble in being freey given.
Which perhaps explains to those who demand evidence before they will believe why God doesn't provide such outright evidence as to his existance.
If we love it because we know it is real, thats not good enough it would seem.
iano writes:
Agreed. He is aware you don't love him. Fully aware. And it he doesn't demand that you love him without reason. That would be unreasonable. The only way you can love God is to know him. It follows that the initial step is to get to know God, not to jump to thinking that you have to love him without knowing him
This only works if you are aware of the xian god. If the initial step is to get to know it, what about the billions who have died without knowing it? Do they go to Hell?
iano writes:
If God exists then his standards are what counts. He can beat any arguement we have hands down because he is in possession of all the facts. We are in possession of only some.
Can't argue with your logic here.
However, having the very appearance of physical evidence rendering any love for your god of lesser value (and therefor good xians should not look for it, or question (see above)) means we can only guess as to its' standards.
Your god has just as much chance of being cruel (as the only evidence we are allowed to percieve would imply) as being nice.