Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,755 Year: 4,012/9,624 Month: 883/974 Week: 210/286 Day: 17/109 Hour: 1/5


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

Abortion

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Abortion
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4924 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 20 of 264 (237146)
08-26-2005 1:53 AM 		Reply to: Message 14 by Nuggin
08-25-2005 7:53 PM

Re: big question
I don't take that stance, but that was the law in most states prior to Roe vs Wade. The idea, I think, is that to force the mother to have the baby would be further victimization of her.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Nuggin, posted 08-25-2005 7:53 PM Nuggin has not replied
  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4924 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 21 of 264 (237148)
08-26-2005 1:57 AM

when life begins
I believe that you should be pro-life if you think life begins at conception, or anti-abortion for whatever point you do think life begins. To have a different stance is to countenance legalized murder.
​
If you don't believe the baby is human, then you are morally free to be for granting women the right to kill it, but I don't think the arguments are too good for maintaining the right to kill your baby after a certain point in development.
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024