Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,748 Year: 4,005/9,624 Month: 876/974 Week: 203/286 Day: 10/109 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Abortion
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 5 of 264 (236984)
08-25-2005 5:55 PM


Here are my positions:
  1. I take the traditional conservative position, that the best government is the least government. This is not an issue for the government to be involved.
  2. I am pro-life. I am opposed to abortion in most circumstances.
  3. I am pro-choice. It is not up to me to force my moral view on others. It is up to the potential mother to make her own moral choices.

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Nuggin, posted 08-25-2005 6:00 PM nwr has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 7 of 264 (236990)
08-25-2005 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Nuggin
08-25-2005 6:00 PM


Re: possitions
Sounds like you are morally opposed but not legally.
I would put it a little differently. I say that it is my moral obligation to avoid putting a woman in a position where she would want an abortion. It's not up to me to decide what is the woman's moral obligation.
Personally, I look at abortion as the worst possible solution to a easily avoidable problem.
I agree.
How could we possibly handle that many more people?
That's an argument for birth control. It should not be an argument for abortion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Nuggin, posted 08-25-2005 6:00 PM Nuggin has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 147 of 264 (253157)
10-19-2005 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by Ben!
10-19-2005 6:01 PM


Re: Abortion is not philosophy, it is policy
OK, so then I was wrong about compromise. You're basically proposing that we break things down regionally, and we don't compromise--but at the regional level.
That was the direction we were heading before Roe v. Wade. I think New York had allowed abortion, or was getting close. It was still a few years away in other states. Roe v. Wade short circuited the political process, and was probably a mistake. It would have been better if this had been worked out through the political system.
But I think we can't go back to the status before Roe v. Wade. Too much has changed since then.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Ben!, posted 10-19-2005 6:01 PM Ben! has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Chiroptera, posted 10-19-2005 6:19 PM nwr has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024