Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,473 Year: 3,730/9,624 Month: 601/974 Week: 214/276 Day: 54/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Budget Deficit Forecast cut by 100 Billion
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 21 of 43 (223698)
07-14-2005 4:40 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Monk
07-13-2005 4:31 PM


That's somewhat close to a concession and is good as it ever gets in support of conservative viewpoints on this forum.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but up till Bush got in the White House a "conservative viewpoint" was that deficits were bad, and less of a deficit is still a deficit?
Call me when the 400 billion projected deficit gets closer to 1 billion, or let's say -1 million. Then we can talk about what "conservative" is.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Monk, posted 07-13-2005 4:31 PM Monk has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 22 of 43 (223699)
07-14-2005 4:52 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Monk
07-13-2005 9:14 PM


Your concession, which you qualified, is that the $100 Billion is good news. That's all. Stop there. It's good news.
So when a plane crash involving your entire family is projected to yield no survivors, and it turns out one member has managed to pull through as a quadraplegic near vegetable, you think: "good news"?
No offense at all at the sarcasm, Holmes keeps me busy with that.
In this recent post on the Rove-Wilson affair I refrained from almost complete sarcasm (I think complete but I'm not sure).
This second post has a little bit of sarcasm, but certainly not too much.
I am giving a little plug for my total and complete public depantsing of Monk. I didn't even have to use witty rejoinders, just documented proof of his errancy using a source he pretended to be knowledgable of, in order to smear an innocent man. The first post is more serious and necessary to read than the second, if you must choose between the two.
This message has been edited by holmes, 07-14-2005 04:56 AM

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Monk, posted 07-13-2005 9:14 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Monk, posted 07-14-2005 3:18 PM Silent H has replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 30 of 43 (223801)
07-14-2005 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Monk
07-14-2005 3:18 PM


Re: Holmes at it again
Except a Hilary win in '08
Why do you keep mentioning this when talking to me? I admit I liked her a while back, but once she fully entered the political arena, and certainly moe recently I have not liked her much at all. I am actually not wanting to see her run in 2008 (I am sick of families dominating govt positions anyway), and the reps could field someone I'd like more than her.
By the way, there has been good news. I was happy that we knocked the Taliban out of power, and still hope something can be made out of the mess that is Iraq.
But I'm not about to view lesser bad news as tantamount to good news.
Giving yourself a little plug? Ha, that's an understatement. You can't help it, it feeds your insecurity. Sad
Okay, it's a big plug. This actually doesn't have to do with my insecurity though. I am sort of proud of what I did, and I would like to make sure people know it is there and so increase the likelihood of people seeing it. Sometimes I get noticed for stuff I wasn't really excited by myself, while things I liked get no notice.
And this also was an attempt to cover my bases to make sure you would see it and respond. Honestly there is simply no way around the mistake you made, and I am hoping to see you finally admit an error, and more importantly than that address what the truth of the situation means regarding Rove and Bush.
Go ahead and plug your counter posts. I really don't mind at all. More importantly though, plug your original post as well as my response (#77) and let people decide who came off better.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Monk, posted 07-14-2005 3:18 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Monk, posted 07-14-2005 5:33 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024