Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,477 Year: 3,734/9,624 Month: 605/974 Week: 218/276 Day: 58/34 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Insect diversity falsifies the worldwide flood.
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2535 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 76 of 148 (339052)
08-10-2006 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Tryannasapien Rex
08-10-2006 6:21 PM


Re: Bristlecone pine
cool. I'll take this to mean that you found my post to you with the two quote formats (i think it was in the 65-69 range)

All a man's knowledge comes from his experiences

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Tryannasapien Rex, posted 08-10-2006 6:21 PM Tryannasapien Rex has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Parasomnium, posted 08-10-2006 6:58 PM kuresu has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 77 of 148 (339054)
08-10-2006 6:55 PM


A Couple Corrections
About the common ancestor of humans and bonobos, it isn't chimps. Chimps and bonobos are cousin species, very closely related. They branched from a common ancestor around 2 or 3 million years ago. Humans and chimps/bonobos branched from an unknown common ancestor around 6 million years ago.
About the expectation that common ancestors be extinct, while it is true that the destiny of all species is eventual extinction, there is no requirement that common ancestors be extinct, though it is often the case.
--Percy

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by kuresu, posted 08-10-2006 7:00 PM Percy has replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 78 of 148 (339056)
08-10-2006 6:58 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by kuresu
08-10-2006 6:45 PM


Showing dBCodes
Kuresu,
To show someone how to use dBCodes, all you have to do is produce a real example and tell them to use the peek button.
Parasomnium writes:
hit the peek button now to see the dBCodes of this quote box

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by kuresu, posted 08-10-2006 6:45 PM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by kuresu, posted 08-10-2006 7:02 PM Parasomnium has replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2535 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 79 of 148 (339058)
08-10-2006 7:00 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Percy
08-10-2006 6:55 PM


Re: A Couple Corrections
thanks for that correction. about the bonobos and chimps and us.
I just want to see if I got your tree right.
_________________unkown ancestor
______________human____________chimp
__________________________chimps____bonobos
??
are there any guesses as to who the unkown is?
edit it in to the post I'm replying to, if you know of a place I can look. it's probably not a good idea to continue in this off topic vein.
Edited by kuresu, : No reason given.

All a man's knowledge comes from his experiences

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Percy, posted 08-10-2006 6:55 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by Percy, posted 08-11-2006 8:22 AM kuresu has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 80 of 148 (339059)
08-10-2006 7:00 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by Tryannasapien Rex
08-10-2006 6:02 PM


Re: Bristlecone pine
Well, I only wanted to correct your timing of the Flood. May the Lord show you the truth, not necessarily about the age of trees but the real truth about Himself.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Tryannasapien Rex, posted 08-10-2006 6:02 PM Tryannasapien Rex has not replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2535 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 81 of 148 (339063)
08-10-2006 7:02 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by Parasomnium
08-10-2006 6:58 PM


Re: Showing dBCodes
well, i didn't say to hit the peek, but I shoed the format, and told about the error I purposely put in, hoping that would work.
oh well . . .
ABE:
the original thing was in Message 63 message 63.
Edited by kuresu, : No reason given.
Edited by AdminJar, : Use peek

All a man's knowledge comes from his experiences

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Parasomnium, posted 08-10-2006 6:58 PM Parasomnium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Parasomnium, posted 08-10-2006 7:12 PM kuresu has not replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 82 of 148 (339064)
08-10-2006 7:12 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by kuresu
08-10-2006 7:02 PM


Re: Showing dBCodes
Well, next time you can save yourself the trouble of going through all that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by kuresu, posted 08-10-2006 7:02 PM kuresu has not replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 83 of 148 (339066)
08-10-2006 7:16 PM


Faith?
Have you thought about my message Message 47?
Edited by Parasomnium, : No reason given.

  
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6375 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 84 of 148 (339072)
08-10-2006 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by randman
08-10-2006 11:09 AM


Re: Ad hoc explanations
Written records denote dinosaurs being observed in Roman and other times, even a few hundred years ago.
going back to actual reports, some quite credible, the descriptions often fit dinosaurs.
Please provide some examples of this (actual quotes or references we can look up). I will be very impressed - not to mention amazed - if this is true.
Edited by MangyTiger, : Added missing 'provide' in request.

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by randman, posted 08-10-2006 11:09 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by randman, posted 08-10-2006 8:24 PM MangyTiger has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 85 of 148 (339087)
08-10-2006 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by MangyTiger
08-10-2006 7:31 PM


Re: Ad hoc explanations
The city of Nerluc was renamed in honor of the killing of a "dragon" there. This animal was bigger than an ox and had long, sharp, pointed horns on its head. There were a number of different horned dinosaurs. The Triceratops is one example.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITALY
A scientist named Ulysses Aldrovandus carefully described a small "dragon" seen along a farm road in northern Italy. The date was May 13, 1572. The poor, rare creature was so small that a farmer killed it just by knocking it on the head with his walking stick.
The animal had done nothing wrong but hiss at the farmer's oxen as they approached it on the road. The scientist got the dead body and made measurements and a drawing. He even had the animal mounted for a museum. It had a long neck, a very long tail and a fat body.
The skeletons of a number of ancient reptile-like creatures match this basic description.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHINA
Thousands of dragon stories and pictures can be found in ancient Chinese books and art. One interesting legend tells about a famous Chinese man named Yu. After the great world flood, Yu surveyed the land of China and divided it into sections. He "built channels to drain the water off to the sea" and helped make the land livable again. Many snakes and "dragons" were driven from the marshlands when Yu created the new farmlands.
Ancient Chinese books even tell of a family that kept "dragons" and raised babies. It is said that in those days, Chinese kings used "dragons" for pulling royal chariots on special occasions, a fact of which famous explorer Marco Polo himself attested to.
One account takes us back to the days of the early Britons, from whom the modern Welsh are descended. They provide us with our earliest surviving European accounts of reptilian monsters, one of whom killed and devoured King Morvidus in 336 B.C. We are told in the amazing account, translated for us by Geoffrey of Monmouth, that the monster "gulped down the body of Morvidus as a big fish swallows a little one." Geoffrey himself described the animal as a Belua. The Belua was described as reptilian, and when we endeavor to compare it with any other animal of today, coupled with the fact that it gulped down Morvidus "as a big fish swallows a little one," we find it difficult in doing so. No land animal of today, let alone reptilian, could devour a human by such standards. Therefore, Geoffrey was either a flat out liar, or he told the truth.
In the British Isles alone there are approximately 200 locations in which dinosaur activity has been reported. Going into the future to the year 1405, we now visit Bures in Soffolk, where a chronicle reveals to us the physical reality of yet another dinosaur:
"Close to the town of Bures, near Sudbury, there has lately appeared, to the great hurt of the countryside, a dragon, vast in body, with a crested head, teeth like a saw, and a tail extending to an enormous length. Having slaughtered the shepherd of a flock, it devoured many sheep."
After an unsuccessful attempt by local archers to kill the beast, due to its impenetrable hide:
"...in order to destroy him, all the country people around were summoned. But when the dragon saw that he was again to be assailed with arrows, he fled into a marsh or mere and there hid himself among the long reeds, and was no more seen."
As you continue to read, you may perhaps think to yourself, "Why aren't these chronicles from history more well known? Why have I not heard or read about these things before?" Sadly, most historians throw aside these accounts, simply because the word "dragon" is used. As the term "dinosaur" wasn't invented until the 1800s, to do so is foolish and a detriment to history itself.
In the 15th century, according to a contemporary chronicle that still survives in Canterbury Cathedral's library, the following incident was reported. On the afternoon of Friday, September 26, 1449, two giant reptiles were seen fighting on the banks of the River Stour (near the village of Little Cornard) which marked the English county borders of Suffolk and Essex. One was black, and the other "reddish and spotted". After an hour-long struggle that took place "to the admiration of many beholding them", the black monster yielded and returned to its lair, the scene of the conflict being known ever since as Sharpfight Meadow.
As late as August, 1614, the following sober account was given of a strange reptile that was encountered in St. Leonard's Forest in Sussex.
The sighting was near a village that was known as 'Dragon's Green' long before this report was published. Original writing has been kept for authenticity:
"This serpent is reputed to be nine feete, or rather more, in length, and shaped almost in the form of an axletree of a cart: a quantite of thickness in the middest, and somewhat smaller at both endes. The former part, which he shootes forth as a necke, is supposed to be an elle long (3 ft. 9 inch); with a white ring, as it were, of scales about it. The scales along his back seem to be blackish, and so much as is discovered under his bellie, appeareth to be red . . . it is likewise discovered to have large feete, but the eye may there be deceived, for some suppose that serpents have no feete . . . (The dragon) rids away as fast as a man can run. His food (rabbits) is thought to be, for the most part, in a conie-warren, which he much frequents . . . There are likewise upon either side of him discovered two great bunches so big as a large foote-ball, and (as some thinke) will in time grow to wings, but God, I hope, will (to defend the poor people in the neighbourhood) that he shall be destroyed before he grows to fledge."
This dragon was reportedly seen in various places within a circuit of three or four miles, and the pamphlet named some of the still-living witnesses who had seen him. These included as follows: John Steele, Christopher Holder, and a certain "widow woman dwelling neare Faygate". Another witness was "the carrier of Horsham, who lieth at the White Horse (inn) in Southwark". One of the locals set his two mastiffs onto the monster, and apart from losing his dogs, he was fortunate to escape with his own life, for the dragon was already credited with the deaths of a man and woman at whom it had spat and how consequently had been killed by its venom. When approached unwittingly, our pamphleteer tells us the monster was:
"...of countenance very proud and at the sight or hearing of men or cattel will raise his neck upright and seem to listen and looke about, with great arrogancy."
Fascinating . . . a true eyewitness account of typically reptilian behavior.
Going ahead to the year 1867, less than 200 years ago (2 years after the American Civil War), the monster that lived in the woods around Fittleworth in Sussex was last seen. It would reportedly run up to people hissing and spitting if they happened to stumble across it unawares, although it never harmed anyone. Several such cases could be cited, but suffice it to say that too many incidents like these are reported down through the centuries and from all sorts of locations for us to say that they are all fairy-tales.
TrueAuthority.com - Dinosaurs - Dinosaurs In History
Here are some details from supposed dinosaur sightings.
Whether or not pterosaur (“winged lizard”) is technically a dinosaur, this flying reptile is still believed by some to have died out 65 million years ago. However, there have been dozens of dinosaur sightings in recent years in the United States alone. In 1961, a business man flying his own plane over the Hudson River Valley was ”buzzed’ by what he said could only be described as a pterodactyl type creature. In 1976 there were at least three very similar sightings in Texas, including one in which three elementary teachers in San Antonio all reported seeing the same creature. One of the most fascinating sightings occurred in 1856 when a railway tunnel was being dug between St.-Dizier and Nancy, France. The Illustrated London News on February 9, 1856, reports that when a large limestone boulder was split open, a creature with a wingspan of 10’ 7” spilled out, flapped its wings, then died, leaving a precise mold of its body in the stone. Recorded sightings of thunderbirds are no stranger to in the American Southwest.1
Since 1938, the coelacanth fish species, believed to have been extinct for a millennia, has turned up as dinosaur sightings in waters from South Africa to Indonesia. One of the most recent sightings of coelacanth were identified during a 2002 dive off the shores of Sodowana, South Africa. Until these live specimens were sighted and studied, they had only been known from fossils.2
By far, the most fascinating dinosaur sightings come out of Africa with similar creatures spotted in Papua, New Guinea. These stories have been persistent for centuries and are too similar to be ignored. A specialized field of study, crypto zoology, has pursued these findings for many years. Consistently over the past 100 years natives talk about mokele-mbembe (blocker-of-rivers). These dinosaur sightings come from varied areas, but are startlingly similar. All of them involve a creature that spends most of its time in the water, though it climbs ashore during the day in search of food. Its size is approximately between an elephant and hippopotamus but with a long neck and small head. And the mokele-mbembe feeds off of specific vegetation and fruit growing along the water’s edge. No matter where they have been spotted in Africa, the natives all say that hippopotamus and alligators quickly leave the section of the river where this creature roams. It is very territorial and aggressively protects its area. Every time natives are shown pictures, they quickly identify a sauropod-type dinosaur, similar in shape to a small Apatosaurus. In 1983, university-trained biologist Marcellin Agnagna began his own excursions into these areas and describes his sighting in an area near Lake Tele. David Woetzel, president and CEO of CCR Data systems is another frequent researcher gathering sighting information of the mokele-mbembe in Africa.3
Sightings of Ogopogo, a plesiosaur-type creature, are abundant and have been well documented in Canada for the past 130 years.
Dinosaur Sightings
Dragons are universally claimed to have been observed in cultures around the world. Keep in mind that despite embellishments and tales, there are consistent accounts around the world that show nothing more than seeing a dinosaur-type of creature.
Edited by randman, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by MangyTiger, posted 08-10-2006 7:31 PM MangyTiger has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by anglagard, posted 08-10-2006 10:07 PM randman has replied
 Message 92 by MangyTiger, posted 08-10-2006 10:50 PM randman has replied
 Message 132 by Tryannasapien Rex, posted 08-24-2006 5:18 PM randman has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 86 of 148 (339091)
08-10-2006 8:50 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by kuresu
08-10-2006 5:15 PM


not the common ancestor
Dryopithecus is interesting, but I don't think he is considered the common ancestor of hominds.
All remains date to between 13 million and 10 million years ago, likely after the common ancestor of the Asian and African ape clades.
http://www.johnhawks.net/...hecus/dryopithecus_overview.html

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by kuresu, posted 08-10-2006 5:15 PM kuresu has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 87 of 148 (339099)
08-10-2006 9:58 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Parasomnium
08-09-2006 5:13 PM


Parasomnium: here's my answer to #47 as requested
Faith writes:
Has anybody calculated it out? Seems to me I've read that genetic experiments with insects, such as with fruit flies, produce changes quite rapidly.
But they're still fruit flies. (Jeepers creepers, I am beginning to sound like a creationist!) What you are suggesting is that just short of a million insect species - and that's only the species we know, there might be many more we have not discovered yet - have evolved from a small base of insects in about 4000 years.
Yeah. I figure fruit flies are one of the end products of a long line of microevolution from back there, after which there isn't much genetic variability left for them to evolve further. In other words the rate of speciation should be slowing down in all life forms.
You are asking if anybody has done some calculations on this. Well, it turns out the answer is yes. In this study you can see that speciation rates are of the order of less than one to a few species per million years.
Sorry, I can't read that file as I would have to download it, and I try to avoid downloading much into my irritable old computer these days.
Even if we assume that the small base on the Ark was as large as half of all insect species extant now, then that would still mean a speciation rate of about 125 species per year. That's a far cry from what scientific studies like the one I mentioned are telling us.
Of course the studies assume that what is seen now is what has always occurred. I haven't read that one, as I say above, but I would expect that to be the case.
Also there would have been more potential for change back then, more genetic possibilities.
How so? What's your basis for this assertion?
It's based on indications in the Bible about how the Fall affected things. General trend of decreasing life spans, decreasing health and vigor of all kinds etc. Decreasing genetic variability seems like a good inference. Ad hoc of course as far as science is concerned.
As for your ad hoc explanation and mine, the one to be chosen is the one that fits with the Bible. Yours doesn't. Mine may not either, but that's the idea anyway
Only if the Bible is true.
Well, no, the point is that I base it on my reading of the Bible, as creationists base all our conjectures about the Flood on the Bible. Whether you think the Bible is true or not is irrelevant to how we arrive at our ad hoc explanations. I was merely saying that your ad hoc explanation had nothing to stand on at all, being just a wild idea about God creating everything yesterday. Unbiblical.
...if that's your answer, then my question becomes: why should we choose the Bible as the touch stone for our theories, and not ancient Egyptian, Chinese, or Indian creation myths, for example? Or other "holy" texts of non-Christian religions still in sway?
Because only the Bible is revelation straight from God Himself, and the others are mere human-originated myths and vague ideas about God that may contain some truth but also a lot of distortion.
Edited by Faith, : Clarify paragraph about the Fall

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Parasomnium, posted 08-09-2006 5:13 PM Parasomnium has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 858 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 88 of 148 (339101)
08-10-2006 10:07 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by randman
08-10-2006 8:24 PM


Re: Ad hoc explanations
Dragons are universally claimed to have been observed in cultures around the world. Keep in mind that despite embellishments and tales, there are consistent accounts around the world that show nothing more than seeing a dinosaur-type of creature.
There are a lot of stories people have told in the past, some are even told today. UFOs, Bigfoot/Yeti, Loch Ness, magical crystal powers, milk-drinking cow statues, ad infinitum. All have many 'witnesses.' Does that mean all stories, however fanciful, now and in the past are true?
Where is the physical evidence of all these 'San Antonio dinosaurs?' Is bigfoot intentionally hiding the evidence with the conivance of his buddy the Abonimable Snowman? Froissart is considered far more reputable a historian than Geoffrey of Monmouth, yet he had tales of some count turning into a bear at will, supposedly collaborated by witnesses. Because he said it does that mean you believe it? Was the plague caused by evil vapors? Are there four elements? Is the earth really flat? Numerically a lot more authorities than dragon witnesses said such was true.
That is until some people discovered science and demanded physical evidence of such wild assertions.
I think you may benefit from a good application of leeches to cure you of such melancholy vapors that seem to cause a belief in magical dragons.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by randman, posted 08-10-2006 8:24 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by randman, posted 08-10-2006 10:25 PM anglagard has replied

  
Tryannasapien Rex
Junior Member (Idle past 4621 days)
Posts: 21
Joined: 02-15-2006


Message 89 of 148 (339102)
08-10-2006 10:13 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by johnfolton
08-10-2006 6:28 PM


Re: Bristlecone pine
you must have not understood me
some of those tree's "the dead one's" have been up on that mountain for 15000 yrs
that predate's your creation time table
or to put it a nother way they where there before your god created them and the earth they grew on
i guess they were floating in space

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by johnfolton, posted 08-10-2006 6:28 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by johnfolton, posted 08-10-2006 11:39 PM Tryannasapien Rex has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 90 of 148 (339106)
08-10-2006 10:25 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by anglagard
08-10-2006 10:07 PM


Re: Ad hoc explanations
Ceolith was extinct for 65 million years.....until a few years ago.
Recapitulation was a fact, at least for evos.
People tell for centuries of seeing dinosaur-type creatures, with fewer reports as time goes on, and lo and behold, we find thousands of fossils indicating such creatures did live.....hmmm,.....but somehow we are suppossed to discount the eyewitness accounts despite a mountain of physical evidence such creatures lived?
Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by anglagard, posted 08-10-2006 10:07 PM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by anglagard, posted 08-10-2006 10:48 PM randman has not replied
 Message 94 by MangyTiger, posted 08-10-2006 11:08 PM randman has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024