Does the evidence support the Flood? (attn: DwarfishSquints)

This is incorrect. The overwhelming majority (off the top of my head 90+ %)of ice is out of the water on Antarctica. If it all melts the sea levels rise by over 60 meters.(some Antarctic ice is floating -- fortunately the major melts and breakups so far have been this ice)

If we take the Himalayas as mountains they were never underwater. The rocks that they are made of were. The fossils, in fact, show that they were not underwater as the mountains they are now.If you think that the fossils show that the mountaints were underwater then I would be very interesting in the facts that you start with (include them all) and the reasoning you follow from them to arrive at such a conclusion.