as you can see, i've edited my first post due to me not looking at the othere ones before it. i accounted for the 200 mil. and it still doesn't come out even.
I make the figures just about spot on. Taking the distance between Norway and Greenland as the narrowest point between the plates, 60 million years since the rifting of Laurasia, and the figure of 2cm/year as the current measured rate of drift, I get that they should be about 2400 km apart. The true figure is 2200 km. That's a good fit of prediction to observation.
the i also added how evolution and the billions of years of the earth cannot be true because of other universal changes. in the 1500's astronomers also accounted that the earth moved farther from the sun and the moon from the earth
In the 1500s? A century before the discovery of the theory of gravity?
I don't suppose you could name any of these imaginary astronomers, eh?
you cannot argue with the facts.
So if only you could
produce some facts, it would be substantially harder to argue with you.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.