But they stuck a laser-guided bomb right on the observation post, if it was indirect, the bunker in which they hid would be relatively unharmed. It survived direct artillary fire.
What's your source for this attack being made with precision weapons? Last I heard they were unsure if it was an airstrike, artillery or both. I call BS on your contention that they would be safe in a bunker from direct artillery strikes. You don't understand the power of modern artillery and I rather doubt the post was hardened sufficiently to protect the men from a direct strike.
What do they have armies for? If they wanted to remove the hezbollah fighters, they should have sent in their men with tanks, instead of sacrificing the UN observers. What you are implicitly saying is that the lives of IDF soldiers were worth more than the unarmed UN observers.
And you are implying that the lives of the UN observers are worth more than those of the Israelis. I'm sorry, this is a war zone; anyone there assumes a level of risk. Unless you have some sort of proof that this strike deliberately targetted the post with the intention of killing the observers(aside from Kofi Annan's asinine comments), you might want to give the promised investigation a chance to reach a conclusion instead of swallowing the media accounts from reporters that weren't there.
When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research
™ Version 4.2
