Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,351 Year: 3,608/9,624 Month: 479/974 Week: 92/276 Day: 20/23 Hour: 6/8


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "...except in the case of rape or incest."
LudoRephaim
Member (Idle past 5102 days)
Posts: 651
From: Jareth's labyrinth
Joined: 03-12-2006


Message 76 of 301 (295553)
03-15-2006 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by crashfrog
03-15-2006 12:47 PM


Actually, I would help her out even after the baby was born. I'm just that kind of person.
Would I drive her to an abortion clinic? I've already said I was pro-life. I'm not rabid though.
"Would you let her stay at your house if your house was nearer to the abortionist than where you lived?"
I think you meant to say would I let her stay at my house if it was closer to a abortion clinic than where she lived. Of course! Why not?
Does my benevolence stretch that far? Hold on. Ill have to measure it. Let's see...I need some rulers, I need to know it's circumfrence...

"The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by crashfrog, posted 03-15-2006 12:47 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by ringo, posted 03-15-2006 1:04 PM LudoRephaim has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 77 of 301 (295556)
03-15-2006 1:02 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by LudoRephaim
03-15-2006 12:21 PM


shades of mythology (literally?)
Hi, Ludo.
quote:
Not meaning to stir up debate. Just giving the info.
No need to keep saying this. There's nothing wrong here with stirring up debate, and certainly no problem with seeming to stir up debate. This is, after all, a debate board.
-
Nice reply. Yes, translations are tricky. I will assume that you realize that there isn't a prophecy in Isaiah that the Messiah would be born of a virgin.
I wonder if arachnophilia will get involved now? He knows a lot about classical Hebrew.
-
quote:
My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place. When I was woven together in the depths of the Earth, your eyes saw my unformed body.
Wow. This is so close to some common mythologies. Taken literally, it certainly brings to mind of the myth of the underworld where the dead live until they are reborn. I wonder, what were the myths of the area at the time when this psalm was written?

"Intellectually, scientifically, even artistically, fundamentalism -- biblical literalism -- is a road to nowhere, because it insists on fidelity to revealed truths that are not true." -- Katha Pollitt

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by LudoRephaim, posted 03-15-2006 12:21 PM LudoRephaim has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by LudoRephaim, posted 03-15-2006 1:36 PM Chiroptera has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 430 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 78 of 301 (295558)
03-15-2006 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by LudoRephaim
03-15-2006 12:57 PM


LudoRephaim writes:
I would help her out even after the baby was born.
How much would you put into his college fund? Would you play catch with him? Teach him to drive?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by LudoRephaim, posted 03-15-2006 12:57 PM LudoRephaim has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by nator, posted 03-15-2006 1:16 PM ringo has not replied
 Message 85 by LudoRephaim, posted 03-15-2006 1:40 PM ringo has replied

LudoRephaim
Member (Idle past 5102 days)
Posts: 651
From: Jareth's labyrinth
Joined: 03-12-2006


Message 79 of 301 (295559)
03-15-2006 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by crashfrog
03-15-2006 12:47 PM


"what is it about american babies that you think nobody wants?"
I never meant to say something like that. It's just at times when a couple want to adopt, and they have the ability to adopt a child here, they may at times adopt a child overseas instead, which means that a chance for a child here to be adopted is closed.
Nothing wrong with american tikes last time I checked.

"The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by crashfrog, posted 03-15-2006 12:47 PM crashfrog has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 80 of 301 (295561)
03-15-2006 1:16 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by ringo
03-15-2006 1:04 PM


quote:
How much would you put into his college fund? Would you play catch with him? Teach him to drive?
How many diapers would you change? Would you hold his head while he vomited? Would you pay for his prescriptions and check ups? Would you take care of the kid during the day (or arrange for child care) so his mom could go to work?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by ringo, posted 03-15-2006 1:04 PM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by LudoRephaim, posted 03-15-2006 1:41 PM nator has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5696 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 81 of 301 (295563)
03-15-2006 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Dan Carroll
03-14-2006 5:05 PM


You're absolutely right. The government has no absolutely business deciding for you.
That's pretty much what being pro-choice is all about.
Except when it comes to killing other people. The Government does have the right and the obligation to set laws that protect people from killing other people. I can't pick up a sniper rifle and go shoot abortion doctors. The government DOES have the ability to decide that that is unacceptable behavior in society and can place penalties on that act.

People don't kill people
Cartoons kill people

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Dan Carroll, posted 03-14-2006 5:05 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by Dan Carroll, posted 03-15-2006 1:38 PM Tal has not replied
 Message 86 by Chiroptera, posted 03-15-2006 1:41 PM Tal has not replied
 Message 97 by nator, posted 03-15-2006 3:58 PM Tal has not replied

Silent H
Member (Idle past 5838 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 82 of 301 (295565)
03-15-2006 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by crashfrog
03-15-2006 12:46 PM


You know what I mean?
Absolutely, your breakdown of the issue is great.

holmes
"What you need is sustained outrage...there's far too much unthinking respect given to authority." (M.Ivins)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by crashfrog, posted 03-15-2006 12:46 PM crashfrog has not replied

LudoRephaim
Member (Idle past 5102 days)
Posts: 651
From: Jareth's labyrinth
Joined: 03-12-2006


Message 83 of 301 (295567)
03-15-2006 1:36 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Chiroptera
03-15-2006 1:02 PM


Re: shades of mythology (literally?)
Hey Chiroptera
The prophecy of the virgin birth in Isaiah is in Isaiah 7:14. From what I have heared, the Hebrew word does not mean "Virgin" but "Young Maiden" or "maiden" as the Updated NASB says in it's footnotes. In the Book "Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus: Volume three, Messianic Prophecy Objections" by Michael L. Brown, it goes in depth on this word in the original classical Hebrew as well as the context. He states that the Hebrew word in question-'almah-can refer to a virgin, but doesn't specifically mean "virgin". It seems the primary relation to this word is adolescence, not virginity (see page 20 of the same book.)This guys blows out of the water the idea that this disproves the importance of the virgin birth in this chapter though (starts page 17, ends page 32)and when it comes to adolescence, Mary of the New Testament still fits the Bill, since people in Palestine during New Testament times where legally able to marry at 13 years old for a boy and 12 years old for a girl (See "Nelson's Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Bible" by John Drake, page 96 under "Monogamy")Now the typical Israelite marraige was usually between an almost 20 year old man and a girl in her early to mid teens (Page 41 of "Holman Bible Handbook) though this must have changed under the Romans in NT times, given the much earlier ages that people where marrying at that time period.
As for the myths of the area: The Jews of the Old testament didn't believe that you either went to Heaven or Hell when you died. Indeed, at first the Hebrews didn't have any concept of an afterlife. They viewed people like most Christians view animals today in one aspect: When you die, that's it! Later the concept of an underworld developed, a place that was gloomy and dark, know in the Old Testament times as "Sheol" which was said to be under the Earth(see "Nelson's Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Bible" page 164, and pages 1482-1484 of "Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary: Completely revised, updated and expanded)
This verse might be hinting that before our bodies are formed in the womb, our souls/spirits are formed in Sheol by God. It is a possibility.
I cant think of other people's beliefs surrounding the afterlife during that time around Israel, save for the egyptian and Greek religions, but I've filled this post enough. Be back.

"The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Chiroptera, posted 03-15-2006 1:02 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 84 of 301 (295568)
03-15-2006 1:38 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by Tal
03-15-2006 1:21 PM


Except when it comes to killing other people.
When there is actually another person involved who can be killed, you're absolutely right.
Of course, now I don't really see the relevance of the whole "I don't support the government doing anything relating to sex" thing.
The government DOES have the ability to decide that that is unacceptable behavior in society and can place penalties on that act.
Only if you can show that it is, in fact, unacceptable behavior.

"We had survived to turn on the History Channel
And ask our esteemed panel, Why are we alive? And here's how they replied:
You're what happens when two substances collide
And by all accounts you really should have died."
-Andrew Bird

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Tal, posted 03-15-2006 1:21 PM Tal has not replied

LudoRephaim
Member (Idle past 5102 days)
Posts: 651
From: Jareth's labyrinth
Joined: 03-12-2006


Message 85 of 301 (295570)
03-15-2006 1:40 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by ringo
03-15-2006 1:04 PM


If I married her, yes. That would be what we call a "white knight" but more than likely I dont think something like that would happen. I would help in some ways, though not in everyway.
Plus I could hit er up with a good guy. Or find a couple that would want the child if she didn't. It would depend on the woman in question.
I could also send the infant off to be a guinea pig for scientific experiments.... :Twisted:

"The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by ringo, posted 03-15-2006 1:04 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by Dan Carroll, posted 03-15-2006 1:44 PM LudoRephaim has replied
 Message 92 by ringo, posted 03-15-2006 2:32 PM LudoRephaim has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 86 of 301 (295571)
03-15-2006 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by Tal
03-15-2006 1:21 PM


quote:
The government DOES have the ability to decide that that is unacceptable behavior in society and can place penalties on that act.
Just like Stalin's Russia!

"Intellectually, scientifically, even artistically, fundamentalism -- biblical literalism -- is a road to nowhere, because it insists on fidelity to revealed truths that are not true." -- Katha Pollitt

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Tal, posted 03-15-2006 1:21 PM Tal has not replied

LudoRephaim
Member (Idle past 5102 days)
Posts: 651
From: Jareth's labyrinth
Joined: 03-12-2006


Message 87 of 301 (295572)
03-15-2006 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by nator
03-15-2006 1:16 PM


Schrafinator: see my last post LOL.

"The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by nator, posted 03-15-2006 1:16 PM nator has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 88 of 301 (295575)
03-15-2006 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by LudoRephaim
03-15-2006 1:40 PM


Plus I could hit er up with a good guy.
Women don't need to decide what they do with their bodies... they just need a good man to take care of them!
Or find a couple that would want the child if she didn't.
I hear this is much like asking someone to help you move. Sure it's a bit much to ask, but if you offer to buy them dinner or something, they'll usually be happy to raise a child for eighteen years.

"We had survived to turn on the History Channel
And ask our esteemed panel, Why are we alive? And here's how they replied:
You're what happens when two substances collide
And by all accounts you really should have died."
-Andrew Bird

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by LudoRephaim, posted 03-15-2006 1:40 PM LudoRephaim has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by LudoRephaim, posted 03-15-2006 1:53 PM Dan Carroll has replied

LudoRephaim
Member (Idle past 5102 days)
Posts: 651
From: Jareth's labyrinth
Joined: 03-12-2006


Message 89 of 301 (295577)
03-15-2006 1:53 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by Dan Carroll
03-15-2006 1:44 PM


Oh boy, I knew I would stir up some sht today. Do women need a good man to take care of them? No, they a good paycheck. But extra income couldn't hurt.
BTW: You didn't debunk my "sending the infant off to scientific experiments done to it" argument. Hehe
"women dont need to decide what they do with their bodies..."
I thought they already did. After all they show them on playboy...

"The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by Dan Carroll, posted 03-15-2006 1:44 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by Dan Carroll, posted 03-15-2006 2:02 PM LudoRephaim has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 90 of 301 (295578)
03-15-2006 2:02 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by LudoRephaim
03-15-2006 1:53 PM


No, they a good paycheck. But extra income couldn't hurt.
See, that's just it. You're putting arbitrary restrictions on their choices that necessitate an extra income.
In other words, whether you intend to or not, you're saying, "You don't need that choice, you just need a man."
You didn't debunk my "sending the infant off to scientific experiments done to it" argument.
*shrugs*
If it results in a race of genetically engineered super-mutants, I'm all for it.

"We had survived to turn on the History Channel
And ask our esteemed panel, Why are we alive? And here's how they replied:
You're what happens when two substances collide
And by all accounts you really should have died."
-Andrew Bird

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by LudoRephaim, posted 03-15-2006 1:53 PM LudoRephaim has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by LudoRephaim, posted 03-15-2006 2:11 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024