Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Terrorist or Freedom Fighter?
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3942 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 44 of 56 (164432)
12-01-2004 4:53 PM


Fired up
I was hesitant to jump into this thread at first but the abhorrant display by PecosGeorge in the pedophile thread has got me fired up.
First off, I don't believe there is a difference between a terrorist and anyone who kills another human being. War and killing is evil. There has rarely if ever in the history of the world been a war that was completely justified and rightous. In this way I believe that gang members who kill are terrorists, murderers are terrorists, etc.
Second, I am a Palestinian by blood and a proud US citizen by birth. I believe that my father's people have every right to have a nation of their own in the same way that our fore fathers had every right to become their own nation. No, Jordan is not the nation of the Palestinians. Jordan is where Jordanians live. Palestinians are generally friendly with Jordanians in the same way that most people from Canada and the USA are friendly with eachother. Palestine might never have been a "nation" as we think of them today but that is simply because the concept of a "nation" did not exist prior to Europeans sticking their bloody fingers into Middle East business. The land where you live is your home and nation. Someone forcibly removing you from your home is a crime plain and simple.
Peace will never be restored in the holy land until:
-tanks no longer crush children under their tread
-millenia old olive groves are no longer bulldozed for no purpose
-crops are no longer set on fire for no purpose
-children are allowed to attend school on a normal basis
-shopkeeps are not forced to pay taxes to an occupying force
-children and teens armed only with rocks are not killed
by men with armor and guns
-homes of widows and innocents are not bulldozed to
provide "protection"
-dogs do not maul children for harvesting olives on their own land
-children are not considered collateral damage
I will be the first to admit that there are many Palestinians who are fighting dirty and do terrible things. But what would you do if all of the above had happend to you and your family. Would you fight? Would you fight dirty?
Peace has to come from the force with the upper hand. There will always be extremists who will fight but Israel has to be the better for there to ever be peace. As long as Palestinians are being treated like POWs they will act like POWs. You cannot say, "I'll stop shooting at you once you stop shooting at me" if you are the one who has the guy backed into a corner and expect there to ever be peace.
Israel cannot follow their own version of the Monroe doctrine and not expect violence in return.
Thanks for listening.
P.S. Before I am accused of it I thought I should state that I am not anti-semetic just anti-Israel, anti-Killing, anti-SenselessViolence, etc.

-Nasser

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by DarkStar, posted 12-03-2004 11:31 PM Jazzns has replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3942 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 47 of 56 (165114)
12-04-2004 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by DarkStar
12-03-2004 11:31 PM


Do "Palestinians" really exist!?!?!
So basically your only major objection to my post is questioning the existence of Palestinians as they are thought of today. One might question your motives for why you would even need to invalidate my father's nationality. Does some how not having an "official" nationality justify the displacement and subsequent terrorizing of the Arabs who had been living there for dozens upon dozens of generations?
This happened elsewhere in history as well. The Cherokee people of Native America lived in the eastern United States for quite some time. They didn't have borders or a capitol building but they functioned quite well in their society in their own way. They had a very family/clan centric society. Now does this lack of a "formal nationality" justify the Trail of Tears?
Yes, Palestine as it was prior to the invasion was just a region not a nationality. Yet the people who lived there were called Phillistini by other Arabs from around the Middle East who they themselves were identified by their locale. There was even a name for the nomads who had no location the Bidwani. You were a people by where you lived even though no formal nation existed. This notion of a state as it is in western society was not pervasive for your average pre-WWII Arab society. Similar to the many Native American cultures they had clans (my clan name is Saramah) and such but they were still considered a Phillistini if they lived in the particular region of topic.
You may choose to refer to yourself as a palestinian but have you had DNA tests to determine this or are you just another confused individual who does not understand the term "palestine" as being a modern reference to ancient Philistia, an area called the "Philistine Pentapolis" which was comprised of the cities of Ashkelon, Ashdod, Ekron, Gath, and Gaza, and was so named for the ancient Philistines who occupied that area?
I resent this. I know who I am and your allegation of my ignorance is both deceitful and ignorant yourself. I am an Arab who’s family has lived for many dozens of generations in a land called Phillistin and my ancestors were called Phillistini by others around them. I can also be called a Dibwani because my particular family lives in a town called DerDubwan. If you were to ask me in Arabic my bloodline I would say Phillistini and if you were an Arab from another region would understand the reference. That name in Arabic is translated Palestinian and no amount of not having a western notion of a nation will make me any less a Palestinian.
Somehow I doubt that you are, as you claim, "a Palestinian by blood" as that would most likely mean you are of European or Greek descent, though you may indeed be so but are more likely an Arab by blood. Perhaps you need to know the answers to the following questions and then you could re-examine your position on what bloodline you should be laying claim to.
I will lay claim to the bloodline that I am and I resent you demeaning it. The Palestinians as we know them today are not the Philistines of ancient. I also will not answer your list of loaded questions.
Regardless of the official nationality of my family the things that have been done to them cannot be justified by said lack of nationality. No one from my family has ever been a terrorist. No one from my family has ever strapped a bomb to their chest and ran into an Israeli settlement shouting ALLLLAAAAAHHH! Yet for many years many of my cousins were not allowed to attend school. Our family farm has been torched by Israeli peacekeepers. Olive trees were bulldozed and next year when they were replanted those were then subsequently bulldozed. Do you know how long it takes a sapling olive tree to start producing fruit? In my family we have a tradition that a grandfather would plant olive trees in his youth so that his grandchildren would be able to bear their first fruit. We are lucky in that we are some who haven’t (yet) had our homes torn down for the sake of peace. What for? I wish someone would tell me why with a legitimate reason!
So in closing:
There are a number of items in your post which I must dismiss as being,IMHO, the result of irrational thinking.
Irrationality can continue to be IYHO. I AM a Palestinian (Phillistini) by decent and an American by birth and no amount of semantic ballet will change that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by DarkStar, posted 12-03-2004 11:31 PM DarkStar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by crashfrog, posted 12-04-2004 11:38 AM Jazzns has not replied
 Message 51 by DarkStar, posted 12-04-2004 9:29 PM Jazzns has replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3942 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 48 of 56 (165115)
12-04-2004 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Silent H
12-04-2004 4:34 AM


Well said holmes. Thank you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Silent H, posted 12-04-2004 4:34 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Silent H, posted 12-04-2004 1:27 PM Jazzns has not replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3942 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 53 of 56 (165338)
12-05-2004 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by DarkStar
12-04-2004 9:29 PM


Re: Do "Palestinians" really exist!?!?!
There is no need to be so sensitive. It is possible that your "bloodline" is from both Arab and European, I have no way of knowing and I really could not care less. My point was that you claimed that you are Palestinian by "blood", something you could not possibly know for certain without a DNA test.
And in fact I am partly European and Native American but that is because my mother is not a Phillistini and I don't need a DNA test to show that. I can claim to be Palestinian by blood because I can trace my heritage back on my fathers side for dozens of generations all to people who lived where we lived now in Phillistin. Your seem to still think that Palestinians don't really exist even though you are talking to one. If you want to call me by the name that other Arabs have called my family for generations Phillistini then you can instead of the westernized name of Palestinian.
I am an American, but I do not claim to be an American by blood as there is no such thing. Not even those who we now refer to as "Native American" are American by blood. Every single individual living on this continent is an immigrant, only the period of time with regards to their migration separates us. Some are American by birth, some by choice, and some by conquest.....but none are so by blood.
This is what make America so unique. It is because America was created BY the immigration of nearly all nationalities that makes it hard to have "American decent". This line is slowly being blurred through as more and more people have a diverse group of ancestry who live in the states. That doesn’t change the fact that I am a Phillistini from my fathers side having that been our identification for longer than you can probably trace your ancestry. Your disbelief does not make it any less fact.
Conquest is nothing new to mankind and for someone to claim that because they choose to call themselves Palestinians gives them the unquestionable right to a certain piece of land is to lend support the argument that because one calls oneself an Israeli or a Jew that they have the unquestionable right to the land of their ancestors.
You have a right to your home because you live there. If someone came and forcibly kicked you out of your home then you would have the right to defend yourself and your property. Palestinians feel they have the right to the land because it was already their land before they were removed by force by an invader!
In fact, the Arabs who also dwelt in that land did not immediately adopt this title either, it is a title that was, in large extent, forced upon them. They knew they were Arabs.
Did you not read my previous post. You are wrong by the very fact that we and other Arabs have been calling us Phillistini for much longer than the westernized word Palestinian has existed. Once again, your disbelief does not make your position true.
If you choose to call yourself a Palestinian that is your choice but do not expect people to buy into the lie that somehow Palestine is your ancient homeland or that anyone who calls themselves a Palestinian has some god given right to the land.
It is my homeland due to the fact that we have actually been living there much longer then you seem to be able to comprehend. If a piece of property has been in your family for 1000 years is that not your homeland? If all the rest of the clans around you have maintained possession of their property for just as long is that not their homeland?
Several nationalities have controlled the land over the millennia, including the Jews who control it once again. I would give no more credence to those calling themselves Palestinians crying out "the land belongs to us" than I would to Mexicans crying out "the land belongs to us" when referring to the Southwest U.S.A., and don't try to use the argument that the Mexicans no longer inhabit that land. I live in that land and believe me, they are a large part of the population, but they live in America, not Mexico.
There is one MAJOR difference between the American conquest of Mexico and the Israeli occupation of the Palestinians. America at one point stopped killing Mexicans so that the healing process could begin. This has not been done in holy land. You see, when keep killing people it only makes them want to kill you more. Unless you kill them all to which one would be no better than Hitler and his plan for the Jews.
It behooves the victor of this action, the Israelis, to cease action on their people of conquest. If killing is not ceased by the invader, then why would you ever expect the resistance to cease?
The Arabs had the opportunity for a Palestinian nation
Who said they wanted a nation? We have a nation here in America and it doesn’t seem to be helping us do anything better than anyone else right now except kill people.
something that has never existed in the history of mankind, but because their nation would exist next to a Jewish nation they chose war instead. They continue to suffer the consequences of that choice.
Get out or die? What a great list of options!!!!
If and when they choose to join the other nations of the 21st century and choose peace with their Israeli neighbors I will applaud them.
How about if first Israel joined the 21st century and started following international law as it relates to human right and the responsibilities of an occupying force? You seem to think that this is all the Palestinians fault and that poor invading Israel is just a victim.
Until that time, they must bear the burden, and the full responsibility, of their children dying needlessly while they continue to engage in a war that cannot be won through terrorist attacks on civilians.
So basically, they need to submit to being terrorized or put up with their children being killed? Isn’t that the same thing!?!?!?!?!
Neither do I buy into the argument that "there are Arab children with stones being killed by Israeli soldiers with guns." One need only be hit in the head with a stone to understand that it too can be a lethal weapon.
Except when you are wearing armor and a helmet or are hmm.lets see. in a TANK!
The only hope for peace is for the Arabs to make peace with Israel, accepting them as their neighbor.
Which can only be done once Israel stops killing and terrorizing the people they occupy. How about that list of things that has happened to my family since the invasion and continues to happen to the people to this day? The story about the Palestinians being harassed by dogs and even shot during their yearly olive harvest is recent.
Until that happens Arab children will continue to die needlessly and Arab adults will have no one to blame but themselves.
And this is the most sick and disgusting perpetuation of hatred and nonsense I have ever hear come out of the mouth of an individual that I can remember. Until you accept your illegal and oppressive occupation, your children are going to keep dying and you have no one to blame except yourself.
I can’t believe a human being claiming to want a peaceful resolution to this would say such a ghastly thing.
It is a sad truth but a truth nonetheless. If I had to choose between sharing land while making peace with an enemy or risk the lives of my children, the choice is a no-brainer. I would choose peace everytime.
Except living next to Israelis is not their biggest issue. It is the fact that they are being killed and terrorized by those Israelis that they are taking offense to. If I don’t like my neighbor for some reason that is fine but as soon as he starts breaking into my house and terrorizing my family then I WILL defend myself.
My children are far more important to me that any piece of land that has changed hands over and over and over again. Too bad the Arabs in power are not so level headed. If they truly cared about their Arabs brothers and sisters, they could have enjoyed the benefits of peace since 1948 instead of the senseless path of war and violence that they chose to embark upon.
What about being able to send your children to school? What if the condition of your acceptance was that you could no longer receive healthcare or educate your children? Would you fight and risk everything? Seems to me that there have been many times in history where a whole bunch of people chose this path and rightly so.
What has it gotten them? Heartache, misery, and poverty...
And who so gladly delivered that heartache, misery, and poverty?
I have my hopes but until the Arabs elect a leader who truly seeks peace I predict several more decades of needless suffering and death on both sides.
Until Israel realizes that they have no right to kill, maim, burn, loot, tax, harass, and bully innocent people then I predict several more decades of needless suffering and death on both sides as well.
ABE:
For many years you have picked olives in the same grove as your fathers. Except now you get shot and and mauled by dogs.
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Ugly war over West Bank olive crop
This message has been edited by Jazzns, 12-05-2004 11:51 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by DarkStar, posted 12-04-2004 9:29 PM DarkStar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Phat, posted 12-05-2004 12:07 PM Jazzns has replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3942 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 55 of 56 (165362)
12-05-2004 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Phat
12-05-2004 12:07 PM


Re: Do "Palestinians" really exist!?!?!
I personally think Israel needs some drastic reforms as it relates to the people who are going to be their neighbors for quite some time. Being that they are the victors of this conquest they have the upper hand, control and therefore responsibility to set the standard for peace. Instead they are playing the historic role of an oppressive, violent, and intolerant nation. America, UK, France, Germany, Russia, Ancient Rome, Persia, Egypt, etc all did this in their history.
Do I hate Israel? Yes, I hate the current incarnation of their bureaucracy that has been shown time and again to purposefully violate international law. I hate terrorism, killing, oppression, and violence against innocents in general.
Do I fear Israel? No I do not personally fear any nation or any man. I fear for those who live under its boot though and pray for enlightenment and the demise of racism and terror.
Do I feel sadness? Of course I feel sadness for the situation. It is a sad and awful testament to how evil man can be on both sides of issue. No one who kills in hatred is innocent but I do feel that the solution must come from Israel.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Phat, posted 12-05-2004 12:07 PM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Silent H, posted 12-05-2004 4:46 PM Jazzns has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024