Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Resident Evil Apocalypse is better than women
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 170 (142894)
09-17-2004 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by macaroniandcheese
09-16-2004 10:14 AM


Re: It WAS a good movie, kiddo
quote:
which was absolutely invaluable and that attitude was reflected in society prior to the 40's
Bollocks. If something is valuable, we pay for it. We didn't (and don't) pay for it and so clearly society asserts its valueless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-16-2004 10:14 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-17-2004 10:36 AM contracycle has replied

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 170 (142901)
09-17-2004 9:40 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by crashfrog
09-16-2004 10:53 PM


Re: Huh
quote:
Seriously, though, I don't know how I managed to put my foot in my mouth to such a degree. What I was trying to say is that the public face of feminism seems a lot more interested in women "connecting with their vaginas" than in pay equity, reproductive choice, the elimination of barriers to employment, etc
Yes but: thats because of the sterotype of feminists being bra-burning hairylegged lesbians. Thats not "telegenic", not fashionable for bourgeois society. The acceptable face of feminism must be pleasant, and nice, and fragrant, and of course, be primarily defined by consumerism.
This message has been edited by contracycle, 09-17-2004 08:40 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by crashfrog, posted 09-16-2004 10:53 PM crashfrog has not replied

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 170 (142922)
09-17-2004 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by macaroniandcheese
09-17-2004 10:36 AM


Re: It WAS a good movie, kiddo
quote:
bullshit. so you want people to pay their wives to work in the home? they get fed don't they? they get clothed don't they? if you actually paid them, it would be prostitution. jesus you have a screwed up view of the world.
Snort; thats silly. Why is it that having sex with someone means you also have to wash their clothes and dishes for free? Is the penis that mighty? I said nothing about paying for sex at all, but if two people are fucking I don't see why only one of them is obliged to clean house.
And as for "getting fed" and "getting clothed", thats about as barbaric a retort I can think of. That puts us back to the woman as dependant, who should be seen and not heard as the heroic male provides for her helpless self.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-17-2004 10:36 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Dan Carroll, posted 09-17-2004 11:36 AM contracycle has not replied
 Message 62 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-17-2004 1:46 PM contracycle has not replied

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 120 of 170 (143570)
09-21-2004 8:30 AM


B2P wrote:
quote:
Okay, in the places where there is definite gender inequality then it's a serious matter. I haven't really looked around, but I don't see much of this.
Then I think it is certainly confirmed that your life experience is about nil.
B2P, let us recall, once assumed I was a 14-year old and suggested life would be a shock once I got out of school. This righteous outrage is just hypocrisy and bluff.

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by One_Charred_Wing, posted 09-21-2004 8:04 PM contracycle has not replied

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 129 of 170 (143596)
09-21-2004 10:13 AM
Reply to: Message 128 by macaroniandcheese
09-21-2004 9:47 AM


quote:
but my case in point. this thread suggests that a movie is better than spending time with a woman. (i saw it. he's right.) and what has taken up the main conversation in it? feminist bullshit.
Really? Misogynists appealing to "femme-nazism" because its PC to be anti-feminist proves your point? A point you make by referring to "feminist bullshit"? Umm, sure.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-21-2004 9:47 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-21-2004 10:16 AM contracycle has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024