Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   101 evidences for a young age...
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4180 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 17 of 135 (510922)
06-04-2009 5:23 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Rahvin
06-04-2009 5:20 PM


OFF-TOPIC
Edited by bluescat48, : as I have said before, sp what else could it be?
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic blather.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Subtitle.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Rahvin, posted 06-04-2009 5:20 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4180 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 59 of 135 (514218)
07-04-2009 11:16 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by greentwiga
07-04-2009 5:38 PM


Re: Ancient paleontology
I also thought it interesting that dinosaur and other thigh bone fossils look very similar to human thigh bones. Could this be the source of the giant myths? Notice also the myths about things turning other things to stone. (gorgons, basilisks) Could this be in response to finding bones turned to stone? With the author finding notes about throwing away fossil bones when unearthing Greek temples, it makes a strong case that the Greeks and others found fossils.
Could very well be. Considering the imaginative powers of humans it would be very logical to assume large thigh bones as being from a giant human if one had no other explanation.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by greentwiga, posted 07-04-2009 5:38 PM greentwiga has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4180 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 124 of 135 (519025)
08-10-2009 3:58 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by Coyote
08-10-2009 11:17 AM


Re: reality testing - the evidence/s neccessary
And if you want to discard this evidence, you'll break a lot of creationists' hearts as they are relying on much flimsier evidence for their claims.
Maybe their hearts wouldn't break if they got some legitimate evidence.
The next thing they will be saying that the Flintstones proves young earth, oh, I forgot that they have already tried that, the "Creation Museum."

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Coyote, posted 08-10-2009 11:17 AM Coyote has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4180 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 132 of 135 (530138)
10-12-2009 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by Blue Jay
10-12-2009 11:40 AM


Re: reality testing
One point that I haven't seen is this. How sure are we that our depiction of Dinosaurs is correct? Could it be that our depiction is more from these drawings than from a totally scientific depiction. Obviously there has to be some speculation as to the actual shape since no one was there to "Take pictures." I find this similar to those who "See" Christ or the Virgin Mary in toast or some other medium. Who, today, knows what they looked like? Again no Photos.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by Blue Jay, posted 10-12-2009 11:40 AM Blue Jay has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024