Iraq had every reason to believe that the US supported, or at a very minimum would not oppose, the initial invasion of Kuwait. This turned out to be a misunderstanding that was certainly the equal of Dean Acheson's remark on "Defensive Perimeters".
So, were April Galaspie's remarks simply taken out of context? Did she play a similar role related to China and Taiwan? Did she accurately reflect current US policy?
Is there a real problem that so many high ranking officials continue to make statements (see recent remarks by Powell, Rumsfeld, Rice etal) that send a mixed or ambiguous message to the world in general and to those critical individuals who actually do make history changing decisions?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion