Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,475 Year: 3,732/9,624 Month: 603/974 Week: 216/276 Day: 56/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Soracilla defends the Flood? (mostly a "Joggins Polystrate Fossils" discussion)
CK
Member (Idle past 4150 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 29 of 190 (153003)
10-26-2004 6:51 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by RandyB
10-25-2004 12:44 PM


Re: You have no chance of learning
Randy - i do to an extent feel for you. You clearly spend a great deal of time carefully selecting the quotes to support you "case".
To see Bill systematically and completely destroy your case in such a total manner must be very difficult for you.
i think you have two choices 1) to retreat and show that your idea is scientifically bankrupt; or 2) to try and tackle some of the points raised with some well sourced evidence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by RandyB, posted 10-25-2004 12:44 PM RandyB has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by RandyB, posted 10-26-2004 12:42 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4150 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 37 of 190 (153468)
10-27-2004 7:13 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by roxrkool
10-27-2004 1:17 AM


Re: Polystrate Fossils of Joggins
you expect to see one?
I think Bill "nuclear strike" B's deconstruction finished him off.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by roxrkool, posted 10-27-2004 1:17 AM roxrkool has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by CK, posted 10-27-2004 7:27 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4150 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 38 of 190 (153472)
10-27-2004 7:27 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by CK
10-27-2004 7:13 PM


Re: Polystrate Fossils of Joggins
SLOT88 Situs Judi Slot Online Terpercaya No 1 di Indonesia
I see Randy's paper is cited (and generally rubbished here) - clearly useful to link to Bill destruction of this "work".
What's the best way to cite Bill's response?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by CK, posted 10-27-2004 7:13 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4150 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 50 of 190 (182436)
02-01-2005 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Bill Birkeland
11-09-2004 12:14 PM


Bump for Bill
Bill do you any problem with me reprinting your "nuclear strike" on Randy S Berg's paper?
http://www.evowiki.org/index.php/Randy_S._Berg
(I - or anyone who wants to help! still need to work on the formatting over there!)
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 01 February 2005 20:30 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Bill Birkeland, posted 11-09-2004 12:14 PM Bill Birkeland has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Bill Birkeland, posted 02-10-2005 3:18 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4150 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 54 of 190 (186592)
02-18-2005 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by RandyB
02-18-2005 11:12 AM


Re: Bump for Bill
LMAO That's great - your response is to point us to a book from 1894.
Let us know when you reach the 20th century!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by RandyB, posted 02-18-2005 11:12 AM RandyB has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by RandyB, posted 02-18-2005 8:17 PM CK has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024