Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,760 Year: 4,017/9,624 Month: 888/974 Week: 215/286 Day: 22/109 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mind's Eye (etc?)
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4666 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 55 of 65 (555887)
04-16-2010 2:16 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by Minnemooseus
04-16-2010 1:19 AM


Re: Mind's Eye article in Discover Magazine
I never knew this could an aptitude that you could 'lose' or even not have.
my mind's eye is OK I guess. When it happens randomly it's usually when a hear a song I listened to a lot while doing something. When I hear the song, I ''see'' what I was doing (usually video games from when I was younger)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Minnemooseus, posted 04-16-2010 1:19 AM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4666 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 57 of 65 (555891)
04-16-2010 3:57 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by Huntard
04-16-2010 3:33 AM


Re: Mind's Eye article in Discover Magazine
You mentionning mental images while reading reminds me something I found quite interesting a 3-4 years ago.
Ever read the book ''perfume'' ? I had to read it when I was in secondary 5 (11th grade a think) . It's the story of this guy who has this incredible sense of smell, and in fact the whole novel is based around that idea. The narrator describes everything through the sense of smell, and so if the main character enters a room, it won't say ''the walls were white'' but it will instead say ''the walls had the odor of rotten cheese in them''.
Now, a year after me and all my friends had read the book, they made a movie out of it. What was interesting was that every friend that saw the movie said that it was almost exactly how they had envisioned it. Myself included.
In other words, this very peculiar manner of describing things in the book had projected the very same images in our minds. Which is radically different from the usual, where everybody reads a book, imagines it totally differently, goes to see the movie and find it to not be like they imagined it.
Although I have never found an answer of why this is the case.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Huntard, posted 04-16-2010 3:33 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-16-2010 4:15 AM slevesque has replied
 Message 60 by Huntard, posted 04-16-2010 4:36 AM slevesque has replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4666 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 59 of 65 (555896)
04-16-2010 4:30 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Dr Adequate
04-16-2010 4:15 AM


Re: Mind's Eye article in Discover Magazine
That's imaginary, isn't it? That was one of the two reasons why I never read it. It imagines a condition that (so far as I know) no human being has ever experienced. This may be clever, but it provides us with no insight into the human condition.
I consider it a must-read for anybody who is interested by litterature.
But I don't really get what you are trying to say.
Well apart from anything else, because it wasn't true. You weren't actually reading a book written by someone who really did experience his world primarily through his sense of smell. Such a book doesn't exist. Such a person doesn't exist. You were reading a book by an admittedly gifted novelist who may have had a severe head-cold throughout the writing of the novel and never smelled anything.
And this is why I find the situation very interesting. Books that describe places with visual references, in other words with the primary sense we use to examine our surroundings, rarely gives two person the same mental images. Yet this book, when describing the places (and the characters, etc.) with the sense of smell, our sense that is almost never our primary one for describing our surroundings, produces the same mental images for almost everybody.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-16-2010 4:15 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-16-2010 7:18 AM slevesque has not replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4666 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 61 of 65 (555898)
04-16-2010 4:42 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by Huntard
04-16-2010 4:36 AM


Re: Mind's Eye article in Discover Magazine
I'm wit Dr. A on this one. This is because no human has ever experienced something like this. This makes you envision it like the writer tells it, which is very limited, because no one knows what it's really like. This makes it easier to come up with the same "images" in your mind.
Look at it this way. When describing the world as seen through "ordinary" senses, we all experience it a bit differently, so we get different images from other people. But now, add an "extra-ordinary" sense, and nobody knows what it's like, so all you have to go on is the author's description.
Hey, I never pretended to know 'why' this phenomenon happened. It was only an observation I had made it the time.
Your explanation seems perfectly reasonable.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Huntard, posted 04-16-2010 4:36 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Huntard, posted 04-16-2010 4:51 AM slevesque has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024