Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,813 Year: 4,070/9,624 Month: 941/974 Week: 268/286 Day: 29/46 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Christianity: For entertainment purposes only?
iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 2 of 64 (468180)
05-28-2008 7:58 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Brian
05-28-2008 7:18 AM


But under the EU Unfair Commercial Practices Directive the onus is now on the person providing the service to prove that they did not intentionally mislead their customers.
The easiest way around the problem would be for the church not to charge for it's services. Then the people going to the church wouldn't be customers anymore.
But it raises an interesting question about the promises made by governments.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Brian, posted 05-28-2008 7:18 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Brian, posted 05-28-2008 8:16 AM iano has replied
 Message 5 by Buzsaw, posted 05-28-2008 8:50 AM iano has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 4 of 64 (468184)
05-28-2008 8:30 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Brian
05-28-2008 8:16 AM


How long would the RC Church last?
About as long as government. Unfortunately.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Brian, posted 05-28-2008 8:16 AM Brian has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 6 of 64 (468186)
05-28-2008 9:11 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Buzsaw
05-28-2008 8:50 AM


Re: Church Charges?
What church do you go to? I've been in churches for 62 years all over the nation and have never seen or heard of one which leveled a charge for membership or attendance of worship services or worship day classes.
It was intended to be tongue-in-cheek Buzz. A response in kind to the manner in which Brain posed his OP (I'm sure)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Buzsaw, posted 05-28-2008 8:50 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 8 of 64 (468197)
05-28-2008 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Brian
05-28-2008 9:59 AM


Re: Church Charges?
Brian writes:
Then we will see how the courts deal with it.
I'd pay good money for a video of the polices response to your 999 call. That's about the only court appearence I'd be envisaging.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Brian, posted 05-28-2008 9:59 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Brian, posted 05-28-2008 11:11 AM iano has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 13 of 64 (468222)
05-28-2008 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Brian
05-28-2008 11:11 AM


M'lud?
Who do you call when you witness someone breaking the law
You mean this law? The one in your OP seems to suppose that the misleading has already been established and the issue has to do with the established misleader proving his misleading wasn't intentional.
Brians OP writes:
But under the EU Unfair Commercial Practices Directive the onus is now on the person providing the service to prove that they did not intentionally mislead their customers.
Imagine I'm the policeman you've called to the scene. Your holding the coin collecting perp by collar awaiting my arrival. You quote the law and say to me....
What precisely?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Brian, posted 05-28-2008 11:11 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-28-2008 2:04 PM iano has not replied
 Message 15 by Brian, posted 05-28-2008 2:19 PM iano has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024