Everyone thinks they are right.
Don't you think there are different tenacities of belief both inter and intra personally? And aren't we often working on probabilities?
I think I irritated my elbow by resting it on the arm of my computer chair, but I also thinks it's possible it started by something else I don't remember like bumping it in my sleep. I'm pretty sure, certainly the chair arms irritate enough now, that I removed them.
So I think I'm right about what I say but I allow for possibilities as often enough in my life new data has come to light and I have changed my mind. So "right" is a value subject to change.
What amazes me is the tenacity with which fundamentalist hold to their interpretations of ambiguous, obscure, or coflicting Bible passages. Two literalist fundamentalist will disagree over whether Jesus is or isn't God for example with great tenacity as if they could know? When we don't even know if Jesus existed or what his life was like. I think that degree of rightness, and it seems fundamentally important to them is something I'm still struggling to understand and is a major motivation for the time I spend here.
The only idea I have is that fundamentalist have to be right because they for reasons I can't yet see have less faith in their place in the universe. I say that because it occurs to me that I do have a feeling that could be called faith that I am a product of the universe and belong and that, hmmm, hard to find words for it, just that in ways I don't understand I fit, and it occurs to me that this is a statement of some sort of fundamental faith. But I'm not sure if I'm RIGHT about this or not.
lfen