quote:
3. Creatures from the Jurassic Periods have been found with animals from Cretaceous.
You dont think its even remotely possible that perhaps scientists just might have their interpretations wrong on some things.
BBC NEWS | UK | England | Gloucestershire | Ice-Age rhinoceros remains found
To take this one point, no there is no reason here to think that the scientists are wrong.
It says that Ice Age (NOT Cretaceous, but much later) and Jurassic remains were found at the same location. In itself that is not at all problematic for conventional geology, and in fact there is a very likely explanation that can be deduced from the nature of the location - a gravel pit.
Gravel is rock broken up into smaller fragments. If a fossil-bearing rock of Jurassic age were broken up into gravel then some fossils - especially durable fossils like belemnites would be found in the gravel itself. As the gravel is transported away from it's origin - other animal remains can become mixed in with it. And so the gravel would contain remains from two different periods - from the time of the rock that the gravel came from and from the time that the gravel was deposited. The BBC story does not give enough information to tell for sure, but it is entirely consistent with what IS said - and the vastly different ages of the remains.