The Flood = many coincidences

You might comment, BlueJay, on the nature of the fish fossils. That is, age, taxa and order.You might also ask about what type of mountains these seamounts are.

Peg, you may not listen to this but it's an attempt to help a bit.You have been lied to! The sources you have used for your information are not honest. They leave facts out, make facts up and do whatever else is possible to mislead you.You can't and shouldn't accept that as correct right away but you must start to entertain the possibility if you are going to learn anything. The dating question is just one area where they lie and lie again.ABE
As an example you might want to invest some time reviewing this link:
Telnet Communications - High Speed Internet & Home Phone SolutionsEdited by NosyNed, : added link

I think this model is incorrect. At least part of the "land" is deformable. Mountains rise and fall over time. If your cup can be deformed then it can be flatten out and under the water.As noted your calculations for Everest must be out of wack.

Have you forgotten the reason this site exists?The argument is with those who want to teach flood geology etc. in science classes and claim that isn't religiously based.They can't evoke miracles and get away with that.