The grand canyon is obvious proof that the flood did happen. Here's why: In the Grand Canyon, rock representing three main stages of evolution claimed to span 150 million years is missing. It is impossible that no sedimentary layers were formed over the extremely long period of 150 million years, and the reason evolutionists give for the missing layers is that erosion took place. One problem with this is that scientists have found no evidence of erosion on such a scale in the Grand Canyon. The layers either side of the 150 million years of missing rock are flat against each other, rather than having the uneven surface one would expect from erosion.
Even for evolutionists the geologic timescale is unreliable. Fossils only found within certain layers are referred to as 'index fossils' as evolutionists often use these to date specific rock layers. On many occasions index fossils have been discovered far earlier or later than they were supposed to have existed: in these situations the fossils are no longer used as index fossils, proving that dating via index fossils is purely speculative.
I mean have you seen a flash flood take place it washes everything away or how about a tsunami?
http://www.drydeadfish.co.uk/...ation_flood_theory/index.php
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Muck up and hide apparent spamish link. Tweak formatting a bit.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Found and completed apparent source link (had been just the home page, thus I thought it was some sort of spam).
™ Version 4.2
