Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,850 Year: 4,107/9,624 Month: 978/974 Week: 305/286 Day: 26/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Too Many Meteor Strikes in 6k Years
mark24
Member (Idle past 5223 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 3 of 304 (210510)
05-23-2005 4:51 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Faith
05-23-2005 3:59 AM


Faith,
Comets won't leave the same isotopic evidence as metorites, they are dirty snowballs.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 3:59 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 1:29 PM mark24 has replied

mark24
Member (Idle past 5223 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 10 of 304 (210596)
05-23-2005 1:40 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Faith
05-23-2005 1:29 PM


Faith,
But as you have learned, there is no evidence of a global flood whatsoever, & the strata that the bolides struck in are associated with mass extinctions. So it looks like they did have an enormous impact (pun unintended) after all.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 1:29 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 1:48 PM mark24 has replied

mark24
Member (Idle past 5223 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 15 of 304 (210604)
05-23-2005 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Faith
05-23-2005 1:48 PM


Faith,
So please present your evidence of a global flood, collect you Nobel Prize on the way out.
Data supports "interpretations", or it doesn't. The flood model is contradicted on any & every level you care to mention. The standard scientific model has the advantage of no contradicting data & a much supporting it. This is just weaselwording so that you don't have to accept the weight of evidence because it is "interpretation".
Mark
This message has been edited by mark24, 05-23-2005 01:55 PM

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 1:48 PM Faith has not replied

mark24
Member (Idle past 5223 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 69 of 304 (210726)
05-23-2005 7:12 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Faith
05-23-2005 4:04 PM


Re: Not 6000 years, 4000.
Faith,
In this discussion we are taking the flood as a given.
No, we are not. I have asked you for the evidence that can be "interpreted" as evidence of a global flood. If you can't provide any, then you have no business accepting it as a reality, much less talking about it as a given here.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 4:04 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 8:25 PM mark24 has replied

mark24
Member (Idle past 5223 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 72 of 304 (210735)
05-23-2005 7:42 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by jar
05-23-2005 7:12 PM


Re: What CAN be said?
Jar,
At the masses & velocities involved, it won't make one iota of difference. A body entering the atmosphere at 17,000 mph will take seconds to impact the surface (nearly 5 miles /sec), & due to the vast amount of energy released, it (the ocean) will be vapourised in a flash, literally, what isn't is simply displaced. The ocean makes very little difference to it.
Mark
This message has been edited by mark24, 05-23-2005 07:43 PM

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by jar, posted 05-23-2005 7:12 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by jar, posted 05-23-2005 8:38 PM mark24 has not replied

mark24
Member (Idle past 5223 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 81 of 304 (210753)
05-23-2005 9:59 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Faith
05-23-2005 8:25 PM


Re: The flood as a given
Faith,
IF there was such a flood THEN the effects predicted in the opening post either would not have occurred or would not have had the devastating effects predicted.
And IF the flood didn't happen & mass extinctions were a corollary of the impacts, then we would see this in the fossil record. We do. If the flood happened, we wouldn't. A very simple evidentially informed choice seems to be in order. Of the two positions, one has data consistent with it & the other doesn't.
Combine that with a total lack of evidence for a global flood, & well, you get the picture.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 8:25 PM Faith has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024