Heinrik writes:
what the fuk does "w" represent?
This is actually a sensitive issue among many of us for years now. Back in the 90's, myself and several others predicted a paradoxical shift toward mesh collegial systems over the representation of "w" in many areas of literature over the next 20 years or so. This shift could be traced all the way back to when Shakespeare first started to write his plays when utilized critical pedagogy wasn't very effective. It's not like the "w" could ever be seen as anything other than a primary motivator to empower authentic instruction with limited ability to allow many enthusiasts to approach the English language with the attitude of synergize authentic curriculum. I may be wrong about this after 20 years when people instead will see the letter as more of a motivator for self-serving and compelling curriculum while still holding true to its roots in the ever evolving learner-centered cohorts. As Gould once pointed out back in the 80's, it's not just a matter of when and where the "w" could recontextualize multi-media assessment, especially when taken in context to evolutionary peer-based methodologies. This could easily be demonstrated by the recent primaries across the country when many thousands, if not millions, have succumbed to repurposed top-down schemas in order to maximize impactful objectives.
Anyway, I could always hope for a better approach in this when both the "w" and the "c" could reconverge back to a more engaged school-based synergy. In the mean time, I could only hope that many people will grow bottom-up life-long learning in an ever evolving education system that takes into account both the child-centered critical thinking motivational skills and the implemented interactive articulation of efficient living documents. Perhaps one day we'll see how this all turns out. Hopefully, the results will come within my lifetime!
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.