Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,409 Year: 3,666/9,624 Month: 537/974 Week: 150/276 Day: 24/23 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Palin Mistake
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 50 of 140 (487981)
11-07-2008 8:47 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by LudoRephaim
11-07-2008 1:16 AM


Re: Republican voters lost the election.
Republicans didn't go out to vote in full strength, and media conservatives continued to attack and disclaim McCain, because they didn't like him, and the latter phenomena had effect on the former. He wasn't a Bush JR. Unlike McCain, Palin was picked because she was ultra-conservative, charming, cute (to me she's hot)and had charisma. But she was also targeted by righters; several people in my own Church (mostly Republicans) didn't like her, one of them (at least) because she was (get this!) PENTECOSTAL! That would no doubt be echoed in other Churches (Southern Bapist, and the like) nationwide.
That has got to be the stupidist reason not to vote. I have often said that in voting one picks the "lessor of 2 evils." No candidate agrees with me on everything. My vote is for the person who agrees more. As for the religious beliefs of a candidate, who cares as long as they keep their beliefs in the church. Idon't care if a candidate is Penticostal, Mormon, Catholic, Presbyterian, Baptist, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, deist, agnostic, atheist or anything else as long as he uses the good judgement toward an idea and not be pro or con solely on religious beliefs.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by LudoRephaim, posted 11-07-2008 1:16 AM LudoRephaim has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Woodsy, posted 11-07-2008 10:03 AM bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 76 of 140 (488071)
11-07-2008 2:34 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by onifre
11-07-2008 1:22 PM


Re: Republican voters lost the election.
Being that im a former Marine(I was 18 and and stupid-lol) I can tell you that troops are considered a weapon. So, yes, if troops mobilize you are deploying them, they are a weapon. If tanks are mobilized you are deploying them as well, they are a weapon. If missiles are placed into position you have deployed them, they are all considered weapons. There is no difference between troops, tanks, or missiles, they are considered US government property and weapons for war, and all 3 get deployed.
Absolutely correct. When a military unit moves from it's stateside home to a theatre of operations, it has been deployed, both troops & equipment, and equipment includes all weapons systems that the particular unit has whether conventional or otherwise.
Edited by bluescat48, : spelling

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by onifre, posted 11-07-2008 1:22 PM onifre has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 90 of 140 (488109)
11-07-2008 6:31 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by kuresu
11-07-2008 5:30 PM


Re: Republican voters lost the election.
the half living in cities larger than 50,000 people--are arguably not "American".
Actually it insulted those who live in any size residential area, not just large cities. This would be just about the entire area of such states as Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island & New Jersey

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by kuresu, posted 11-07-2008 5:30 PM kuresu has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024