I haven't decided if those messages need to be wiped clean. Are spam links that are generally on topic (for the forum as a whole, if not for the specific topic) still still to be treated as other spam links would be?
I let Ed back in after he appealed his earlier suspension, but he just spammed the site with five barely intelligible threads in just 12 minutes to the Coffee House forum. He's been permanently suspended.
Suzanne Romano, 24 hours - A transition from "a little spammy" to "too damn spammy"?
The "little red dot" suspension message:
Her first topic was spammish but relevant to this forums interests. Now there is a second similar topic. And now she has a banner graphic signature, promoting and linking to the second topics video. Things are just getting too spammy. 24 hr suspension - Time for the various admins to evaluate these topics legitimacy (OSLT) - Adminnemooseus
Re: Suzanne Romano, 24 hours - A transition from "a little spammy" to "too damn spammy"?
I received a lot of flak for promoting her second topic---I suppose I should have read the first one through more thoroughly. My reasoning was to give another creationist a chance ti explain themselves. I disliked her signature and even removed it once---she put it back on.
It seems as if even her alleged "own words" are too spammy.
Still, I wanted to give her a chance.
Im beginning to agree with Moose though. She seems to have a one track mind and its all based on that one website.