randman writes:
In fact, the vast majority of research by evolutionists is not research to validate ToE since they assume it as a given, but they research various areas and apply the ToE assumption to the research.
You demonstrate a misunderstanding of the nature of scientific theories.
We adopt scientific theories because of their goodness of fit, not because of their "validity". Nobody is researching the validity of the theory of gravity either, nor that of the theory of general relativity. However, any serious problem in fitting the data would be quickly noticed.
We check the validity of observations. That's what the replicability of results is all about. But the requirement for theories is different from the requirement for observations.
If you want to overturn the theory of evolution, then you must either produce a replacement theory which is an even better fit, or you must find incontrovertible data which is such a bad misfit that it cannot be accomodated within the theory.