So, yes, that finding is very relevant to the question of the adequacy of chance, which is very relevant to the case for design. In the 2004 paper I reported experimental data used to put a number on the rarity of sequences expected to form working enzymes. The reported figure is less than one in a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion. Again, yes, this finding does seem to call into question the adequacy of chance, and that certainly adds to the case for intelligent design.
So, another creationist halfwit who hasn't bothered to find out what the theory of evolution is, and thinks that whining about his strawman of "chance" will establish intelligent design.
If that worked, the creationists would have won a long time ago. They'd have won the
first time one of them was too lazy and dumb to find out what the theory of evolution is.
Failed. Next.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
