Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,789 Year: 4,046/9,624 Month: 917/974 Week: 244/286 Day: 5/46 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Noah's Ark has been found
jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 106 of 126 (324638)
06-21-2006 10:36 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by Buzsaw
06-21-2006 10:23 PM


Re: Ignoring the Evidence
How many times do I need to say some of Wyatt's and most of Moeller's Biblical archeological research does have evidence and regardless of what anyone thinks about Wyatt, most of his critics refuse to even try to look at it to see if some of the more significant of it is credible or not?
You can say it as often as you want. But until you get the cojones to actually post some alleged evidence it doesn't carry much weight. Hard to discuss evidence that is not presented.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 10:23 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 863 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 107 of 126 (324639)
06-21-2006 10:36 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by Buzsaw
06-21-2006 10:23 PM


Re: Ignoring the Evidence
quote:
How many times do I need to say that Wyatt was the pioneer of some significant Biblical related exploration evidence without the expertise or equipment, but others with better expertise and equipment have verified the existence of some, (I say 'some') evidence which secularist experts refuse to look at?
I'm relatively new here as are some others. Could you please indulge me by providing examples of the evidence you are referring to in this thread?
Edited by anglagard, : bad quote brackets

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 10:23 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 10:56 PM anglagard has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 108 of 126 (324644)
06-21-2006 10:46 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by CK
06-21-2006 2:50 AM


Re: GD Wyatt's Aqaba
CK writes:
This most be evidence in a different reality because I don't remember seeing it. Lysimacus was reduced to saying "wait til you see the evidence you'll all be convinced.. It will be revealed sometime in the future". That was it - that was all he had - that and some handwaving about bad photos and experts with no names.
You need to go back to my message 91 to see in what context my claim about evidence was. It was in the context of Jar's previous claim which applied to much more than just the AOC and the blood. I admit that it was pretty much off topic to start with on the part of both of us. However since so many were saying such negative stuff about Wyatt, I saw the need to remind the folks that not all of Wyatt's work was bogus. Without him, likely nothing at all would have been researched in the fields of his work.
I've stated my skepticism about the blood and the AOC, so you should assume that I'm not claiming any evidence on that count. I'm merely attempting to refute the claims by most that the guy's work is all nut case stuff.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by CK, posted 06-21-2006 2:50 AM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by arachnophilia, posted 06-21-2006 10:54 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 111 by anglagard, posted 06-21-2006 10:58 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1370 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 109 of 126 (324647)
06-21-2006 10:54 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by Buzsaw
06-21-2006 10:46 PM


Re: GD Wyatt's Aqaba
Without him, likely nothing at all would have been researched in the fields of his work.
is his field "cranksterism?"
because real biblical archaeology goes on all the in israel.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 10:46 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 11:06 PM arachnophilia has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 110 of 126 (324648)
06-21-2006 10:56 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by anglagard
06-21-2006 10:36 PM


Re: Ignoring the Evidence
anglagard writes:
I'm relatively new here as are some others. Could you please indulge me by providing examples of the evidence you are referring to in this thread?
Hi anglagard. I hope my message 108 to CK will be sufficient for you. To add to that would be off topic to this thread. Perhaps when I do a Great Debate with Brian on the Exodus that will help answer your question. In the mean time, you may want to go to google and google Ron Wyatt's website for some of his stuff. The EXODUS VIDEO covers Moeller's research quite well. It's available for purchase on line as well as exerpts from the video.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by anglagard, posted 06-21-2006 10:36 PM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by anglagard, posted 06-21-2006 11:14 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 120 by deerbreh, posted 06-22-2006 10:17 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 863 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 111 of 126 (324649)
06-21-2006 10:58 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by Buzsaw
06-21-2006 10:46 PM


Re: GD Wyatt's Aqaba
quote:
I'm merely attempting to refute the claims by most that the guy's work is all nut case stuff.
Sorry to say but I'm glad you're not my lawyer (no insult intended, but your defense of Wyatt appears weak IMHO). Please let us know what you feel is not "nut case stuff."
Edited by anglagard, : grammar
Edited by anglagard, : trying to be nice

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 10:46 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 11:10 PM anglagard has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 112 of 126 (324651)
06-21-2006 11:06 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by arachnophilia
06-21-2006 10:54 PM


Re: GD Wyatt's Aqaba
I see no good reason for them to research anything pertaining to the AOC until more evidence is produced. It appears that they have nothing to research. To comment further on the other more significant stuff would be off topic.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by arachnophilia, posted 06-21-2006 10:54 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by arachnophilia, posted 06-21-2006 11:18 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 113 of 126 (324652)
06-21-2006 11:10 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by anglagard
06-21-2006 10:58 PM


Re: GD Wyatt's Aqaba
anglagard writes:
Sorry to say but I'm glad you're not my lawyer (no insult intended, but your defense of Wyatt appears weak IMHO). Please let us know what you feel is not "nut case stuff."
Some of you people seem hell bent on drawing me off topic and I ain't goin there.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by anglagard, posted 06-21-2006 10:58 PM anglagard has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 863 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 114 of 126 (324653)
06-21-2006 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by Buzsaw
06-21-2006 10:56 PM


Re: Ignoring the Evidence
Appparently we posted simultaneously, as to that site been there done that. You are right, a new thread is appropriate as this line is going off-topic. However, I still want to hear from you concerning what you think constitutes compelling evidence regarding Wyatt and his subsequent supporters wherever and whenever that may occur.
ABE - will post no further in this thread concerning this OT request
Edited by anglagard, : clarity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 10:56 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 11:24 PM anglagard has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1370 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 115 of 126 (324655)
06-21-2006 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 112 by Buzsaw
06-21-2006 11:06 PM


Re: GD Wyatt's Aqaba
I see no good reason for them to research anything pertaining to the AOC until more evidence is produced.
uh, i can think of one group that's produced exactly as much evidence as wyatt has, only with a twist. they claim to have the ark of the covenant. but you can't see it. and if you try to jump the fence, they shoot you with ak-47's.
It appears that they have nothing to research
yes, it does appear that way, doesn't it? kinda looks like, i dunno, somebody just made a bunch of stuff up.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 11:06 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 116 of 126 (324657)
06-21-2006 11:24 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by anglagard
06-21-2006 11:14 PM


Re: Ignoring the Evidence
Fair enough, my friend. First I've got to get myself read up to debate Brian on some of it. He'll be a tough opponent. Hopefully for all, the truth will win out regardless of which ox gets gored. Wyatt pioneered the research that Brian and I hope to debate in the not too distant future.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by anglagard, posted 06-21-2006 11:14 PM anglagard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by RickJB, posted 06-22-2006 3:23 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5017 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 117 of 126 (324708)
06-22-2006 3:23 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by Buzsaw
06-21-2006 11:24 PM


Re: Ignoring the Evidence
Buz writes:
How many times do I need to say some of Wyatt's and most of Moeller's Biblical archeological research does have evidence...
How many times do you have to be asked to produce it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 11:24 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by lfen, posted 06-22-2006 4:06 AM RickJB has not replied
 Message 119 by Buzsaw, posted 06-22-2006 8:42 AM RickJB has not replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4704 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 118 of 126 (324718)
06-22-2006 4:06 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by RickJB
06-22-2006 3:23 AM


Re: Ignoring the Evidence
How many times do you have to be asked to produce it?
gee, I thought all you had to do was claim you had evidence? That sounds like more than enough. You mean people are actually expected to produce it?! Sounds like you're just a kill joy or something trying to throw a wet blanket on all of Ron's exciting wonderful stories of Adventure.
I mean why should Indiana Jones have all the glory? And box office! Did anyone expect him to produce evidence? When you are dealing with the Ark of Covenant and kill all those Nazis with the spirits in there well that is so obvious you don't need any stinkin evidence and neither does Ron!
I have the evidence and I'm certainly not gonna share it with the likes of you because a) I don't have to and b) you can't make me. It's mine to know and yours to find out. This is my story and I'm sticking to it.
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by RickJB, posted 06-22-2006 3:23 AM RickJB has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 119 of 126 (324786)
06-22-2006 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by RickJB
06-22-2006 3:23 AM


Re: Ignoring the Evidence
Rick writes:
How many times do you have to be asked to produce it?
As many times as the folks indicate the need for it.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by RickJB, posted 06-22-2006 3:23 AM RickJB has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by ramoss, posted 06-24-2006 11:24 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2919 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 120 of 126 (324823)
06-22-2006 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by Buzsaw
06-21-2006 10:56 PM


Re: Ignoring the Evidence
The EXODUS VIDEO covers Moeller's research quite well. It's available for purchase on line as well as exerpts from the video.
Oh goodie. I will get to that as soon as I finish John Woodmorappe's book 'Noah's Ark: A Feasibility Study.' Do they take Visa?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by Buzsaw, posted 06-21-2006 10:56 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024