Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Jesus Tomb Found
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6208 days)
Posts: 58
From: Pasadena, CA
Joined: 04-16-2007


Message 236 of 242 (396100)
04-18-2007 10:15 PM


THAT IS NOT HIS TOMB!!
Here are some points as to why that is not Jesus' tomb:
-That tomb was found in 1980. If it really was Jesus's tomb, then they would have been much more eager to get it to the public instead of waiting 27 years.
-That tomb was found in a construction site, while the workers were digging to make the foundation of a future apartment building. Underground in that entire area, was a huge collection of other tombs. If it was Jesus's tomb, then the people who buried him would have at least buried him in a much more hidden location than amongst many others (which was a known graveyard) in order to let thier 'conspiracy religion' live on. [which it wasn't].
-In those other tombs, on the stones, they found that the #1 man's name was Joseph, the #3 woman's name was Mary, the #3 man's name was Matthew, and the #5 man's name was Jesus. So it is just pure coinsidence that they found a tomb containing those names. Think about this, who is the Matthew, and why would there be a Matthew in Jesus's tomb? Also, they do not know for sure what the second 'Mary' inscription is. Therefore, they are automatically assuming that it is Mary Magdeline, which is retarded.

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by Nuggin, posted 04-19-2007 3:11 AM ArchArchitect has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024