Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pat Robertson on natural disasters
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 73 of 302 (253556)
10-20-2005 10:05 PM


I just spent a good hour researching and typing up the prophecies of Jesus concerning the latter days before the end of the age and his 2nd advent to earth as per the Olivet Discourse prophecy of Jesus in Matthew 24 and Luke 21. My server disconnected when attempting to review and I lost it all. Sorry, but I don't have time to do it all again.
In short, he prophesied the return of Jewish occupation of Jerusalem, the perplexity of nations about roaring seas, billowing waves, diverse earthquakes, preaching of the gospel worldwide, threat of end of life on earth, TV tech where one event in the sky is viewed worldwide by all nations, persecution of Christians, signs in the sky, et al.
Pat Robertson has made his share of goofs and doesn't speak for me on quite a bit, but as per the thread OP, you people who ridicule Pat as a fool on these end time events relative to the Biblical prophecies simply have not done your own homework on what the OT Biblical prophets, Jesus and his apostles have written and taught on this. You need to do some Biblical research on your own as he has done and as I have done on this. Then come back and refute the points of his statements in the thread OP, rather than eating up thread bandwidth, bashing the man. Get off the messenger's back and focus on the messenger's statements.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by DrJones*, posted 10-20-2005 11:08 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 76 by Thor, posted 10-20-2005 11:47 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 113 of 302 (253870)
10-21-2005 8:23 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by Lizard Breath
10-21-2005 9:10 AM


Re: Waaaaait a minute
quote:
These views of Robertson's are his own interpretations of what he is reading and believing.
But Pat did very little in the way of interpretation. He stated them, plain and simple. They are no more mysterious than your statements here in this post. You mean what you have clearly posted and so do these.
quote:
I find it failed logic to subscribe that if anyone disagrees with Robertson's views that they are not a Christian. They may not be a "Robertson Christian", but his views are not a litmus test for inclusion into Christianity as a Faith.
Right. However, it does reveal that those Biblical Christians who fault and chastize Robertson for his quotes need to brush up on the scriptures of their book before criticizing Robertson here.
quote:
In a general sense he has some creadance to what he is saying. The End Times Events are nearing. But the Bible says that nobody knows the hour and day which means that prognosticators do not have enough information to start setting dates for end times events.
He didn't set specific dates, did he? After giving a number of things to watch for, Jesus himself said in Luke 21:28, "But when these things begin to come to pass, look up, and lift up your heads; because your redemption draws near." He goes on in the next couple of verses to tell of the fig tree and how you can tell by watching it when the harves is near. Then this in verse 31: Even so, you also, when you see these things coming to pass, know you that the kingdom of God is near.
quote:
The Bible is also clear that when the events start to occur, the Earth will curse God for the affair. This means that when it goes down, there will be no doubt as to why this stuff is happening. We are not at that point yet because few believe these events are nothing but Natural cycles. When the events take on End Times intensity, doubts of natural cyclic occurance will cease.
Not only are the natural disaster graphs spiking up, but they are soundly corroborated by other non-geological fulfilled prophecies, such as the one of Jesus that Jerusalem, after a long gentile occupation would again be occupied by Jews, all of the OT prophecies which predicted a scattering and latter day return of the Jews to Israel, the industrial revolution, high tech communication, signs in the sky, advanced knowledge and travel, consolidation of a mideastern Arab alliance against Israel, et al.
Paul said that Jesus comes as a thief to them in the darkness, but to the children of the light he would not come as a thief. Why? Because the people of the light know the prophecies and what to look for. No we don't know the day nor the hour, but the scriptures are clear that those who search the scriptures prayerfully and carefully, will be apprised when the end times are near. Trust me. I've been doing my homework for 60 years, watching the prophecies relative to the news, et al. THE END TIMES FOR ARMAGEDDON AND THE 2ND ADVENT OF JESUS IS VERY NEAR! THE PROPHECIED WRATH OF GOD UPON PLANET EARTH IS NOW EMERGING UPON US. So is the tribulation/persecution of Christians. We're all caught up in it, but the rapture (catching up} and resurrection of the saved will come before the events of the 7th trumpet, i.e. the 7 bowls of God's wrath which will be upon the ungodly who missed the resurrection of the dead and the rapture of the saved living.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Lizard Breath, posted 10-21-2005 9:10 AM Lizard Breath has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by crashfrog, posted 10-21-2005 8:27 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 115 of 302 (253898)
10-21-2005 9:46 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by crashfrog
10-21-2005 8:27 PM


Like the book
quote:
Are you all going to disappear like in the books? Because that's the part that I'm looking forward to.
Not "the books?" Not really, but like the book. You know. That Book of books, the worlds best seller, ever -- the book of life......and the same book prophesies that people like you will regard us just as you're doing. You, my friend, are fulfilling Biblical prophecy! Why don't you smell the coffee and switch sides?

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by crashfrog, posted 10-21-2005 8:27 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by crashfrog, posted 10-21-2005 10:53 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 194 of 302 (254590)
10-24-2005 10:36 PM
Reply to: Message 185 by FliesOnly
10-24-2005 10:57 AM


Re: Invention of a Christian Consensus
FliesOnly writes:
Certainly there are things that Pat Robertson says that all Christians agree with...correct? How am I to know when he speaks a truth for all and when he speaks a truth for his particular subset? Perhaps in the examples we have been discussing it could be argued that the differences are obvious. But again, how do we know where to draw the line between understanding when he speaks a “truth” for all Christians and when he speaks on some other level?
There are what we regard as Biblical conservative Christians. These are the fundamentalists. Then within the fundamentalists you have the charismatic penticostals tending towards the Armenian and the more Calvanistic Baptist types. Then there's the more Biblical liberal Christians who liberally interpret scriptures and are generally not very evangelistic/evangelical.
For me, the Biblical fundamentalist, the answer to your question above is to agree with those statements of Robertson which are scripturally fundamental and literal and disagree with him when he gets un-Biblically literal, which he does, imo quite often in interpretation of certain scriptures. This also, imo, is where he gets himself into hot water.
If a more liberal Christian were to answer your question you're going to get a more vague answer relative to what a given individual thinks; usually more of a world view, which will likely be quite negative and, imo, unfair. Why unfair? Because they should understand that Robertson, a more Biblial fundamentalist Christian than some, especially so far as the OP of this thread was quoting lots of scripture and being very literally fundamental as to what the Bible says on the subject pertaining to the op.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 185 by FliesOnly, posted 10-24-2005 10:57 AM FliesOnly has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by Silent H, posted 10-25-2005 12:27 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 200 of 302 (254793)
10-25-2005 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by Silent H
10-25-2005 12:27 PM


Re: Invention of a Christian Consensus
buzsaw writes:
Because they should understand that Robertson, a more Biblial fundamentalist Christian than some, especially so far as the OP of this thread was quoting lots of scripture and being very literally fundamental as to what the Bible says on the subject pertaining to the op.
Holmes writes:
I watched Pat do his thing regarding natural disasters for years. While Politicians were not doing what he said (specifically Democrats) every one of them had the omen of the second coming and a slam on the current administration. That is God was judging what this nation's gov't was doing.
That's not how it works. The latter day wrath of God is like before Noah's flood. The people have become corrupt morally, denying the true god, going after other gods, spurning his salvation and his son, Jesus, disregarding God's commandments, etc. Governments can't fix a corrupt people, especially in a republic such as ours where the people essentially rule. His wrath is upon the people in general of the world. Yes there's lots of good people, but when so many turn from God's word, et al, judgement comes. When our nation which was once known as a Bibically Christian nation with the Bible in the school house and in every aspect of our lives is now to the place where it's message is forbidden in the schools, the Ten Commandments are outlawed, et al, and we're reaping the whirlwind, literally. The Bible someplace says that the whirlwinds (tornadoes and hurricanes) are God's ministers. God's people are also being more increasingly hated and persecuted by the people of the world.
Holmes writes:
Why do you feel he is correct in his speculations when he was predicting the end for years and it did not come, and... now that his recommendations are being put into practice by our gov't they have met with more of God's disproval than Democratic actions had... he has decided to stop using natural disaster's to discredit those in power?
1. See my message 113.
2. What recommendations are your speaking of?
Holmes writes:
Even if one believed in prophecy shouldn't one be doubting his prophecies?
Not when they're simply prophecies of the Bible which he's quoting and not when they're being fulfilled before our eyes as we watch our TV screens.
Holmes writes:
I would also like your evaluation on why we have faced the worst disasters in our nation's history... ever... both manmade and natural, ever since a conservative took office and has instituted policies the religious right has wanted for years?
They're going to escalate, no matter who's in power. Only a repentant populace will turn things around and that doesn't seem to be happening.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by Silent H, posted 10-25-2005 12:27 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by Silent H, posted 10-26-2005 8:58 AM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 204 of 302 (254965)
10-27-2005 12:24 AM
Reply to: Message 201 by Silent H
10-26-2005 8:58 AM


Holmes writes:
Absence sure hasn't changed your methods.
What's your problem? I responded to your points forthrightly. You should do the same for me. Most of this post of yours digresses from the specific points I made in response to your statements and questions.
Holmes writes:
Just to let you know, he is now backing off of his statements regarding the second coming. If you have read his recent statements he caveats all of his claims with "well it might not mean anything" kind of stuff. That is unlike his commentary over ten years ago where he was pretty self assured.
That means he is shifting AWAY from quoting that something is being fulfilled before our eyes. Doesn't that say something?
My comments pertained to quotes from him in the OP of this thread. It's me who's saying what he quoted is being fulfilled before our eyes. I don't know what you're referring to as to him backing off, but so far as the OP goes, he's pretty much right on relative to what is Biblically prophesied and what he seems to be applying those scriptures to in the op quotes. Do you have a link specifying and clarify your contention that he's backing off of anything he's quoted as saying in the OP?
Edited quote ending
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 10-27-2005 08:22 PM

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by Silent H, posted 10-26-2005 8:58 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 206 by Silent H, posted 10-27-2005 6:50 AM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 207 of 302 (255111)
10-27-2005 12:03 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by Silent H
10-27-2005 6:50 AM


Focus on Topic
Holmes writes:
You are correct that my post did not address your specific points. It was a rewrite of my original post. That you feel it was a digression, merely substantiates the fact that you were addressing something other than what I was wanting to discuss. I rewrote to try again to get us talking about what I wanted to talk about originally.
................ I was actually moving away from just the article in the OP to get at his general comments related to such things. Both Prophecy and judgement.
I've stated more than once that Pat Robertson does not speak for me on many things, but that as for the OP he pretty much does. I have neither the time nor desire to analyze Robertson perse. The thread originated as a bashing criticism of Robertson, citing his "natural disasters" quotes. The concensus of the thread posts by all was to agree with the author of the OP. My purpose and intent in my involvement was to support Robertson's position relative to the OP quotes, showing that by observation of the natural disasters trend the planet is experiencing, these critics are wrong and Robertson is right in that the Biblical prophecies quoted by him are being fulfilled. I've also shown that other timely simultaneous latter day prophecies corroborate/support his and my position on that as well as weaken the position of the critical majority on this board.
Other stuff about the man unrelated to the topic which is Robertson on natural disasters, leads the thread off topic, so please don't fault me for not following you there.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by Silent H, posted 10-27-2005 6:50 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by jar, posted 10-27-2005 12:06 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 211 by Silent H, posted 10-27-2005 6:30 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 213 of 302 (255217)
10-27-2005 8:13 PM
Reply to: Message 208 by jar
10-27-2005 12:06 PM


Re: Focus on Topic
jar writes:
Pat Robertson's position on Natural Disasters is a clear example of Blasphemy.
What, specifically, did he say which you regard as blasphemous?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by jar, posted 10-27-2005 12:06 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by jar, posted 10-27-2005 8:15 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 215 of 302 (255224)
10-27-2005 8:46 PM
Reply to: Message 214 by jar
10-27-2005 8:15 PM


Re: Bashing Robertson
jar writes:
Attributing Natural Disasters to GOD is blasphemous.
Specifically what statement of Robertson quoted in the OP attributes them to God?

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by jar, posted 10-27-2005 8:15 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by jar, posted 10-27-2005 8:50 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 217 of 302 (255238)
10-27-2005 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 216 by jar
10-27-2005 8:50 PM


Re: Bashing Robertson
jar writes:
Natural disasters are just that. Natural. They have nothing to do with GOD. They are NOT on a rise. They presage NOTHING.
Specifically what in your OP quote quotes Robertson as attributing the disasters to God? I don't see it. He's saying in context of his other statements that Biblical prophecies prophesied that disastrous geological and weather events would occur in the latter days. We all know that there has been a spike in the graph of disastrous events of this nature since about the time the Israel/Jerusalem prophecies were fulfilled in the last half century. How is it blasphemy for Robertson to observe and speak on these prophecies relative to what is observed? Where has he attributed the disasters to being caused by God?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by jar, posted 10-27-2005 8:50 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by jar, posted 10-27-2005 11:06 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 223 of 302 (255420)
10-28-2005 9:33 PM
Reply to: Message 218 by jar
10-27-2005 11:06 PM


Re: Bashing Robertson
jar writes:
There is no indication that there has been an increase in natural disasters. Secondly, there is no evidence of any Biblical prophecies being fulfilled. Ever.
1. Jar, I usually don't copy and paste a mess of links like this, but you are being so doggedly bulligerent in denial of what's going on in the real world of disaster that I felt the need to put your argument to rest. Here are just a few of the scores of links either stating outright or implying the fact that natural disasters are spiking up in recent decades. Please understand also that most of the links out there available are based on old stats and don't even factor in the upspike in frequency of disasters since the turn of the millenium.
links writes:
Losses in the range of US$ 50 billion and 50 000 people killed: Munich Re's list of major natural .
G Berz - Natural Hazards, 1984 - springerlink.com
... Re from all over the world confirms that 1990 maintained the trend of previous years:
loss burdens from natural disasters are increasing dramatically; from the ...
Cited by 1 - Web Search
Disaster Management System for Southwestern Indiana
PE Nasim Uddin, D Engi - Natural Hazards Review, 2002 - dx.doi.org
... Even lacking consistent and complete data, clearly damage and fatalities from natural
disasters are increasing, both in the United States and in the rest of ...
Cited by 3 - Web Search - link.aip.org - csa.com - csa.com
Hydrological forecasting.
JC Rodda, HJE Rodda - Dealing with natural disasters: Achievements and new . , 1999 - royalsoc.ac.uk
... There is also growing concern that the frequency and magnitude of natural disasters
are increasing because of the onset of climate change. ...
Cited by 2 - View as HTML - Web Search
society that it divides.
UNER Coordinator - who.int
... natural disasters. We live in a world where the risks of natural disasters are
increasing through global warming. Many at risk populations ...
View as HTML - Web Search - who.int
Environmental Statistics: Current and Future
AH El-Shaarawi, J Teugels - International Statistical Review, 2005 - projecteuclid.org
... Recent WMO press release (WMO, 2003) suggests that the frequency and severity of
natural disasters are increasing worldwide, in particular for hydro ...
Web Search - projecteuclid.org
Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Spatial Databases and the Internet: A Framework for .
S Herold, M Sawada, B Wellar - geomatics.uottawa.ca
... 1.2 Disaster management from an information technology perspective Although natural
disasters are increasing in frequency as global population rises, so are ...
View as HTML - Web Search
THE MASS MEDIA AND DISASTER AWARENESS IN PUERTO RICO
M PEREZ-LUGO - Organization & Environment, 2001 - oae.sagepub.com
... cations in contemporary disaster management because the evidence suggests that human
and economic losses related to natural disasters are increasing around the ...
Web Search - oae.sagepub.com - ingentaconnect.com
TOWARDS A FAIR DISTRIBUTION OF LOSSES: SIMULATION OF A FLOOD SCENARIO
L Brouwers, S KTH, H Verhagen, S KTH - dsv.su.se
... KTH, Sweden * ABSTRACT Natural disasters are increasing, possibly due to
climate changes and changes in land use. Economic losses ...
View as HTML - Web Search
Adapting traditionalshelter fordisaster mitigationand reconstruction: experiences withcommunity- .
T Schilderman - Building Research & Information, 2004 - dx.doi.org
... Blaikie et al. (1994, p. 34) found that natural disasters are increasing
steadily and have tripled in number between 1970 and 1990. ...
Web Search - taylorandfrancis.metapress.com - ingentaconnect.com
Risk Management in Water and Climate-the Role of Insurance and Other Financial Services
H Hoff, L Bouwer, G Berz, W Kron, T Loster - germanwatch-ev.de
... Frequency and severity of natural disasters are increasing worldwide, in particular
for hydro-meteorological extremes, posing a serious threat to the ...
View as HTML - Web Search - wac.ihe.nl - waterandclimate.org
2. Jar, to blatantly insist that there is no evidence of any Biblical prophecies being fulfilled ever is nonsense.
To say there's no evidence at all shows clearly your ignorance of the subect you're debating here. You, the moderator, need moderated. If I were to go on a science forum insisting there's no evidence of the existence of electrons, it would be no worse than your absurd claim here and I would be shut down in a heartbeat. It would show my ignorance. Over the years I and others have documented evidence of fulfilled prophecies which remain unrefuted, yet you keep on making these false claims that there's no evidence whatsoever of any.
Edited to add: "evidence of" to the last sentence.
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 10-28-2005 09:49 PM

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by jar, posted 10-27-2005 11:06 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by crashfrog, posted 10-28-2005 9:49 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 225 by jar, posted 10-28-2005 9:58 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 226 by nator, posted 10-29-2005 6:22 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 227 of 302 (255566)
10-30-2005 12:35 AM
Reply to: Message 225 by jar
10-28-2005 9:58 PM


Re: Bashing Robertson
buzsaw writes:
To say there's no evidence at all shows clearly your ignorance of the subect you're debating here.
jar writes:
Start a thread on it and let's see if this time you can come up with even ONE prophecy that's ever been fulfilled. It might be interesting.
I've produced evidence for many prophecies over the years, but no matter how substantial they are, you choose to pshaw them. You remind me of the NT Pharasees who observed the miracles of Jesus and the apostles, being also shown by the OT prophecies that Jesus was the christ/messiah, setting about immediately to persecute or kill the ones performing them because they were so set in their ways and beliefs. It was these folks who had Jesus eventually crucified by the government.
Are you even yet ready to admit that natural disasters have been on the increase in recent decades since the rebirth of the nation of Israel and the reocupation of Jews to the city of Jerusalem? Pat Robertson, whom you despise and judge as blasphemous, appears to be smarter than you in this regard.
Edited to drop an s from governments.
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 10-30-2005 12:38 AM

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 225 by jar, posted 10-28-2005 9:58 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 229 by jar, posted 10-30-2005 9:53 AM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 228 of 302 (255567)
10-30-2005 12:45 AM
Reply to: Message 226 by nator
10-29-2005 6:22 PM


Re: Bashing Robertson
Hi Schrafinator. Shall we stick to topic as per the OP? Where in it has Robertson said the natural disasters referenced were punishments from God? I understand him to be saying they were likely prophesied by God's prophets in the Biblical historical record.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by nator, posted 10-29-2005 6:22 PM nator has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 230 of 302 (255640)
10-30-2005 12:41 PM
Reply to: Message 229 by jar
10-30-2005 9:53 AM


Re: Bashing Robertson
Jar, one nice thing about debating you is that you are so obviously wrong on so much that it's a piece of cake winning. The downside of it is that you are such a waste of time. Anyhow, so as not to be accused of cutting and running, I'll eat up some more bandwith and respond. What you need, imo, is a few suspensions until you stop presenting these strawmen, et al.
buzsaw writes:
Are you even yet ready to admit that natural disasters have been on the increase in recent decades since the rebirth of the nation of Israel and the reocupation of Jews to the city of Jerusalem?
jar writes:
No, of course not. That is simply one of those nonsense statements that is the hallmark of the Fundamentalist and Evangelical. Not only is there no evidence that that is true, the evidence from ice cores, as just one example, seems to show that the last 10,000 years have been a period of remarkable consistency with nowhere near the violent natural disaster that is the norm.
Now jar, this is a blatant strawman. Please reread my statement which you purport to have responded to. I clearly stated that this is about the last few decades since the rebirth of Israel - not 10,000 years. Please either respond to my posts in kind and in sincerety or don't bother.
jar writes:
There is one difference you fail to mention. I happen to believe in Jesus and his message, unlike the Fundies and Evagelicals that actually are trying to crucify both the truth and other individuals.
Then why do you deny so much of what he said, like the miracles which he performed, et al? Another one of your strawmen.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by jar, posted 10-30-2005 9:53 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 231 by jar, posted 10-30-2005 12:55 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 232 of 302 (255658)
10-30-2005 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 231 by jar
10-30-2005 12:55 PM


Re: Bashing Robertson
buzsaw writes:
Then why do you deny so much of what he said, like the miracles which he performed, et al? Another one of your strawmen.
jar writes:
Please point out where I said that or admit that you are only misquoting and misrepresenting your opponents position yet again.
Jar, I've been on this board for years. I know, you know and anyone else who's been around for long knows that you have denied all the miracles of the Bible except the virgin birth and the resurrection of Jesus -- and on one occasion you expressed doubt about one of those.
buzsaw writes:
Now jar, this is a blatant strawman. Please reread my statement which you purport to have responded to. I clearly stated that this is about the last few decades since the rebirth of Israel - not 10,000 years.
jar writes:
What a truly stupid statement. Are you seriously implying that we should only look at the period since the establishment of Isreal and ignore all that came before? No wonder you can find prophecy in the Bible. You select only the facts that fit your preconceived notions.
Jar, me old adversarical friend, is it that you've been drinking heavily, or are you really that out of it these days? The topic and all we're suppose to be addressing in this thread topic is whether the rise in number of natural disasters and loss of life and property the planet is experiencing is indicative of the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy as per Pat Robertson. What we are not suppose to be addressing is the geological and weather the planet has been experiencing for 10,000 years. I've mentioned the fulfillment of the rebirth of Israel prophecies because this corroborates/strengthens Robertsons and my position that the rise in natural disasters are evidence indicative that what the Bible predicts may (I say may) be being fulfilled or that that time is near.
jar writes:
Even in your simplistic imaginary Universe, your assertions don't hold up. So far you have shown no evidence that natural disasters are on the rise in either number or magnitude. Sure costs are up, more people live in exposed areas.
Jar, please reread the links I've cited, especially those which show that both the incidence of natural disasters and the loss of life and property are increasing in recent decades. Why don't you cut and past their statements and refute them rather than blindly and doggedly denying the facts. Please remember also, that these links don't even factor in the upspike in disasters of the last few years of the new millenium.
I don't have time for chat. Either you begin making some sense in your responses or don't expect any more of my time being expended on addressing your strawmen. You need to move to a forum where you know something about what your debating. Why do you get by with this nonsense when if I, Faith, Mike the Whiz or some other Biblical creo engaged in such conduct, we'd be suspended or even banned.
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 10-30-2005 04:07 PM

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 231 by jar, posted 10-30-2005 12:55 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by Phat, posted 10-30-2005 4:57 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 234 by sidelined, posted 10-30-2005 5:04 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 235 by jar, posted 10-30-2005 5:08 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 236 by Asgara, posted 10-30-2005 5:14 PM Buzsaw has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024