Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-20-2019 10:04 PM
25 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, edge (3 members, 22 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: anglagard
Post Volume:
Total: 857,225 Year: 12,261/19,786 Month: 2,042/2,641 Week: 551/708 Day: 110/135 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Man raised back to life in Jesus' name
LinearAq
Member (Idle past 2873 days)
Posts: 598
From: Pocomoke City, MD
Joined: 11-03-2004


Message 53 of 300 (273189)
12-27-2005 10:19 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by randman
12-26-2005 7:31 PM


Re: prove it
...I don't treat the things of God via science, and learned that it is not always wise to try to use "proof" to let people know in terms of documentating miracles.

While I agree with arach's statement that miracles cannot be "proven", what's wrong with investigating them scientifically? Don't you think it would be a tremendous draw to Jesus if some miracles were highly docmumented? If enough evidence is provided for the "non-naturalness" of the occurance a majority of people would believe in its supernaturalness.

Didn't Jesus himself use miracles to draw in unbelievers?

John 5:36

"I have testimony weightier than that of John. For the very work that the Father has given me to finish, and which I am doing, testifies that the Father has sent me."

John 10:25

Jesus answered, "I did tell you, but you do not believe. The miracles I do in my Father's name speak for me..."

John 10:38

...believe the miracles, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father."

I would think that if it is good enough for Jesus to use miracles as a lure, then it should be good enough for the Church today. Kind of surprising that they don't try harder to show off the miracles that do happen.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by randman, posted 12-26-2005 7:31 PM randman has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019