All randman said in his OP was, "MIracles still happen today."
I read that as a statement of fact. It may only be his belief, but I read it as him presenting that belief as a fact. If I made an error in evaluating that, I apologize.
quote:
If someone says 'Unicorns still visit us', I would take that as being a statement of belief, not a scientific claim. If someone retorts "No, they do not", that is an absolute statement. To make an absolute statement, one needs to be absolutely sure.
I think such a statement could be interpreted either way, but point taken.
I agree that absolute statements should be avoided when possible. I didn't mean to imply that one was warranted, but merely that the claim doesn't gain credibility because it can't be proven to be false.
quote:
This strikes me as being odd. Am I the only one who read randman's statement as being a statement of belief, not an assertion?
Again, I read "miracles still happen today" as randman matter of factly stating that miracles indeed happen today. If I misinterpreted it, I apologize and retract my statement.