Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,766 Year: 4,023/9,624 Month: 894/974 Week: 221/286 Day: 28/109 Hour: 1/3


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Creation/Evolution In The News ⇒

flying spaghetti monster flap in kansas

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   flying spaghetti monster flap in kansas
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.3

Normal Thread Display
Message 144 of 148 (311377)
05-12-2006 10:24 AM 		Reply to: Message 138 by Faith
05-11-2006 11:29 PM

Re: Nice that you know
How the ad hominems do proliferate.
​
What ad hominems? There is not even one in SNC's post. It's a fact that "You have demonstrated on here time and time agian that you know little to nothing about geology, biology and science in general". Not only that, but seem proud of your ignorance. I think the general concensus is that SNC paints a very accurate picture of you.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 05-11-2006 11:29 PM Faith has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by Faith, posted 05-12-2006 11:08 AM kjsimons has replied
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.3

Normal Thread Display
Message 146 of 148 (311390)
05-12-2006 11:18 AM 		Reply to: Message 145 by Faith
05-12-2006 11:08 AM

Re: Nice that you know
talking about ME instead of the topic is an ad hominem.
​
Not necessarily, from Ad hominem - Wikipedia
​
Validity
​
Ad hominem is fallacious when applied to deduction, and not the evidence (or premise) of an argument. Evidence may be doubted or rejected based on the source for reasons of credibility, but to doubt or reject a deduction based on the source is the ad hominem fallacy.
​
Premises discrediting the person can exist in valid arguments, when the person being criticized is the sole source for a piece of evidence used in one of his arguments.
​
1. A committed perjury when he said Q.
2. We should not accept testimony for which perjury was committed.
3. Therefore, A 's testimony for Q should be rejected.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by Faith, posted 05-12-2006 11:08 AM Faith has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by Faith, posted 05-12-2006 11:25 AM kjsimons has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024