Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,483 Year: 3,740/9,624 Month: 611/974 Week: 224/276 Day: 0/64 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Death Penalty and Stanley Tookie Williams
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 29 of 54 (268900)
12-13-2005 4:49 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by arachnophilia
12-13-2005 3:54 PM


Give the convicted the choice?
Capital punishment is an act of frugality. The real reason it's around is because it's cheaper.
It is my understanding that the add expenses involved in going though the pre-execution appeals is greater than the costs of a life sentence.
I would tend to think that spending the rest of your life in prison is more severe than being executed. Either way, you are destined to die in prison.
My inclination is against the death penalty:
1) Seemingly, a life sentence may well be less expensive for the government to pay for.
2) A non-execution is at least somewhat reversable.
I have the idea that the decision of an execution should be left to the convicted. The convicted is facing dieing in prison either way. Why not offer the choice of how soon?
Moose
Edited to change subtitle.
This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 12-13-2005 04:51 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by arachnophilia, posted 12-13-2005 3:54 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by arachnophilia, posted 12-13-2005 5:09 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024