Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
11 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,462 Year: 3,719/9,624 Month: 590/974 Week: 203/276 Day: 43/34 Hour: 6/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fundamentalists (of all stripes) at it again (Re: Textbook Wars: Religion in History)
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 89 of 194 (282338)
01-29-2006 3:40 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by Admin
01-28-2006 9:28 AM


Re: Uncalled for
Admin writes:
You're making the debate personal and ignoring moderator requests. My own inclination is to give you a 24 hour suspension, but I'll instead ask AdminBuzsaw to look in.
My response for now is to direct Randman to my message #281, read it and to proceed with the discussion, keeping the points of my message in mind. I am personally quite supportive of Randman's position here on this topic but do agree that he needs to tidy up his manner of presentation so as not to cause offense. http://EvC Forum: General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution -->EvC Forum: General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution
Abe: Until I learn to link up exact messages, link up to the url and schrool down to message 281
Randman: Percy is being quite gracious, imo, in allowing me to interceed a bit here rather than an outright suspension. Lighten up, good bud and work hard at keeping the peace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been edited by AdminBuzsaw, 01-29-2006 03:44 PM
This message has been edited by AdminJar, 01-29-2006 02:54 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Admin, posted 01-28-2006 9:28 AM Admin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by randman, posted 01-29-2006 6:16 PM AdminBuzsaw has replied

  
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 97 of 194 (282411)
01-29-2006 10:13 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by randman
01-29-2006 6:16 PM


Re: Uncalled for
Here's the deal:
1. Keep focused on the topic here in this thread. Imo, it appears you're doing fine debating your points, though I'm not sure that I've read the entire thread.
2. Regardless of your assessment of the manners of others, work on keeping your own above reproach.
3. If and when you have a significant specific problem with the manners of others, including mods, bring it to the attention of admins in the moderation thread, rather than debating it here or wherever you're posting, so as not to inflame things here and elsewhere. If someone inflames, don't respond in kind. I'm not singling you out here. I've given Crashfrog the same advice, to which he responded in a kindly manner. We will work hard to iron these problems out for the good of all and to do it in a fair and balanced manner. This is what AdminPercy wants and that's why he's allowing us to resolve it short of flat out suspensions.
4. If and when you have a mod complaint, best to refrain from generalized criticisms as you're doing here. That's simply going to irritate them and make things more unpleasant for you. I've been remiss in area myself in the past and have been working on that. The more I work with them, the more I see that they're willing to work for improvement also.
5. Cheers!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by randman, posted 01-29-2006 6:16 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by nator, posted 01-31-2006 9:56 AM AdminBuzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024