Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8950 total)
29 online now:
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 867,271 Year: 22,307/19,786 Month: 870/1,834 Week: 370/500 Day: 3/66 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Testing
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 6896
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 50 of 67 (518990)
08-10-2009 8:51 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Percy
08-10-2009 8:45 AM


Re: Unicode Test
I use Firefox. The original posted by slevesque had character problems. None of yours, that you posted here, has had a character problem.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Percy, posted 08-10-2009 8:45 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 6896
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 51 of 67 (518991)
08-10-2009 8:56 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Percy
08-10-2009 8:20 AM


Re: Unicode Test
I tested both the Japanese and British children on the same tasks, showing them very accurate, detailed photographs of selected natural and man-made objects and then asking them questions about the causal origins of the various natural objects at both the scientific level (e.g. how did this particular dog become a dog?) and at the metaphysical level (e.g. how did the first ever dog come into being?). With the Japanese children, it was important to establish whether they even distinguished the two levels of explanation because, as a culture, Japan discourages speculation into the metaphysical, simply because it’s something we can never know, so we shouldn’t attempt it. But the Japanese children did speculate, quite willingly, and in the same way as British children. On forced choice questions, consisting of three possible explanations of primary origin, they would predominantly go for the word "God," instead of either an agnostic response (e.g., "nobody knows") or an incorrect response (e.g., "by people"). This is absolutely extraordinary when you think that Japanese religion — Shinto — doesn’t include creation as an aspect of God’s activity at all. So where do these children get the idea that creation is in God’s hands? It’s an example of a natural inference that they form on the basis of their own experience. My Japanese research assistants kept telling me, "We Japanese don’t think about God as creator — it’s just not part of Japanese philosophy." So it was wonderful when these children said, "Kamisama! God! God made it!" That was probably the most significant finding.

copied and pasted using Firefox.

I do not see any issues here.


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Percy, posted 08-10-2009 8:20 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Admin, posted 08-10-2009 8:57 AM Theodoric has not yet responded
 Message 53 by Huntard, posted 08-10-2009 9:19 AM Theodoric has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019