I only read a few pages of one thread of simple's imput. The attitude, imo, was not good, in light of the fact that there should be enough respect and gratitude to Percy and the others who've worked so hard to provide this place to speak our mind to the www.
On the other hand, some of the input of simple which likely worked towards the suspension is not a bit worse than a lot of the refuteless refute refuters on the other side are passing off as refutable refuting to refutees.
One area where I guess I see this the most is the way many secularists seem to have the compulsion to refute anything that indicates anything that is the least bit indicative of a supernatural dimension regardless of how weak their argument. This all, bar none, goes unchecked by moderation or admin, who of course themselves are paranoid of the supernatural. This leaves posters like me with either ignoring such posts by multiple counterparts who rush to the defense of one another, regardless, and being loudly criticized for doing so or spending a good deal of the limited time I have to post on responding to a good deal of refuteless nonsense.
I'm not saying this is always the case or that I simply don't get to some posts deserving of response. I'm saying that more attention is given to superfilous input by creationists by a chorus of adversaries, some of who superfilously superflow their own share of superfility.
™ Version 4.2
