Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,460 Year: 3,717/9,624 Month: 588/974 Week: 201/276 Day: 41/34 Hour: 4/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   fossils and catastrophism.. Funk has a question
John
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 10 (31517)
02-06-2003 9:15 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by funkmasterfreaky
02-05-2003 4:27 PM


quote:
The very fact that there are so many fossils, in the layers suggests that there have been a great many, or a few very tremendous and sudden catastrophies in the history of the earth.
How exactly do the layers point to both options? Big events lok different than small ones.
quote:
Now if all these layers were formed as gradually as mainstream geology would lead us to believe, how are there so many fossilized organisms? I would think at such a gradual rate, that almost all remains of these organisms would have rotted and detoriated long before they had a chance to fossilize.
There aren't many fossils considering the time frame, because most rotted and deteriorated before they had a chance to fossilize.
quote:
There are full large mammals frozen in the ice, with food still in their stomachs! This had to happen in a major hurry!
Why? Current conditions near the poles and at the tops of some mountains are sufficient for this effect.
quote:
If there have been such major catastrophies in the history of the earth, we must be very flawed in thinking that things have changed at the rate we currently observe.
Major catastrophies leave evidence, funk. No one denies that they happen, but only deny the ones for which there is no evidence.
quote:
Please forgive my spelling, I'm having one of those days when the english language looks and sounds absurd to me.
Well, when you mix and match about thirty languages that's what you get.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 02-05-2003 4:27 PM funkmasterfreaky has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 02-06-2003 9:46 PM John has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 10 (31611)
02-07-2003 12:01 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by funkmasterfreaky
02-06-2003 9:46 PM


quote:
I know that catastrophies leave physical evidence, however isn't it possible that future catastrophies could, "damage" evidence of the first event.
Sure. Its possible, but assuming a catastrophic event of good size it would take quite a lot to erase all of the evidence. The ash from the last eruption of the Yellowstone super-volcano is spread over a huge chunk of North America. Wiping that out would be a trick, though its not impossible. On the other hand, some of the larger impact craters could have erased all the evidence of some smaller catastrophes-- floods, that sort of thing.
I suspect you are thinking of Noah's Flood. Winging it a little, wiping out the evidence of a truly global catastrophe would be virtually impossible unless that catastrophe occured billions of years ago.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 02-06-2003 9:46 PM funkmasterfreaky has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 02-18-2003 4:53 AM John has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024